Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 8;14(1):47.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens14010047.

Identification of Potential Vectors and Detection of Rift Valley Fever Virus in Mosquitoes Collected Before and During the 2022 Outbreak in Rwanda

Affiliations

Identification of Potential Vectors and Detection of Rift Valley Fever Virus in Mosquitoes Collected Before and During the 2022 Outbreak in Rwanda

Isidore Nsengimana et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is an emerging mosquito-borne arbovirus of One Health importance that caused two large outbreaks in Rwanda in 2018 and 2022. Information on vector species with a role in RVFV eco-epidemiology in Rwanda is scarce. Here we sought to identify potential mosquito vectors of RVFV in Rwanda, their distribution and abundance, as well as their infection status. Since an outbreak of RVF occurred during the study period, data were obtained both during an interepidemic period and during the 2022 Rwanda RVF outbreak. Five districts of the eastern province of Rwanda were prospected using a combination of unbaited light traps and Biogents (BG Sentinel and Pro) traps baited with an artificial human scent during three periods, namely mid-August to mid-September 2021, December 2021, and April to May 2022. Trapped mosquitoes were morphologically identified and tested for viral evidence using both RT-PCR and virus isolation methods on a Vero cell line. A total of 14,815 adult mosquitoes belonging to five genera and at least 17 species were collected and tested as 765 monospecific pools. Culex quinquefasciatus was the most predominant species representing 72.7% of total counts. Of 527 mosquito pools collected before the 2022 outbreak, a single pool of Cx. quinquefasciatus showed evidence of RVFV RNA. Of 238 pools collected during the outbreak, RVFV was detected molecularly from five pools (two pools of Cx. quinquefasciatus, two pools of Anopheles ziemanni, and one pool of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato), and RVFV was isolated from the two pools of Cx. quinquefasciatus, from Kayonza and Rwamagana districts, respectively. Minimum infection rates (per 1000 mosquitoes) of 0.4 before the outbreak and 0.6-7 during the outbreak were noted. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis indicates that RVFV detected in these mosquitoes is closely related to viral strains that circulated in livestock in Rwanda and in Burundi during the same RVF outbreak in 2022. The findings reveal initial evidence for the incrimination of several mosquito species in the transmission of RVFV in Rwanda and highlight the need for more studies to understand the role of each species in supporting the spread and persistence of RVFV in the country.

Keywords: RVFV detection; Rift Valley fever; Rwanda; mosquitoes; outbreak; vectors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of Rwanda showing the five districts of the study area, and location of sampling sites used before and/or during the outbreak. The map was drawn using the QGIS version 3.24.1 freely available at https://www.qgis.org/en/site/https://www.qgis.org/en/site/, accessed on 25 October 2024.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on RVFV L and M segments partial sequences. New sequences obtained in this study are marked with a black dot. The phylogenetic tree tips are labeled as accession, name, country, and year of specimen collection. Values below the node indicate the bootstrap support values (in %) for that node. The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using MEGA 11 software [49].

Similar articles

References

    1. Kuhn J.H., Brown K., Adkins S., de la Torre J.C., Digiaro M., Ergünay K., Firth A.E., Hughes H.R., Junglen S., Lambert A.J., et al. Promotion of order Bunyavirales to class Bunyaviricetes to accommodate a rapidly increasing number of related polyploviricotine viruses. J. Virol. 2024;98:e01069-24. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01069-24. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daubney R., Hudson J.R. Virus Disease of Sheep. J. Path. 1931;XXXIV:545. doi: 10.1002/path.1700340418. - DOI
    1. WHO Rift Valley Fever Key Facts. 2018. [(accessed on 1 April 2024)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/rift-valley-fever#tab=tab_1.
    1. OIE Aetiology, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Prevention and Control References OIE Tech Dis Cards. 2019. [(accessed on 16 June 2024)]. Available online: https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Animal_Health_in_the_World/docs/....
    1. Anywaine Z., Lule S.A., Hansen C., Warimwe G., Elliott A. Clinical manifestations of Rift Valley fever in humans: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022;16:e0010233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010233. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources