Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;20(5):623-628.
doi: 10.1177/17474930241313301. Epub 2025 Jan 25.

Design and early progress of the Comparison of Anticoagulation and anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis (CAPTIVA) trial

Affiliations

Design and early progress of the Comparison of Anticoagulation and anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis (CAPTIVA) trial

Brian L Hoh et al. Int J Stroke. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The usual antithrombotic treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) consists of dual treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin for 90 days followed by aspirin alone but the risk of recurrent stroke remains high up to 12 months. The Comparison of Anticoagulation and anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis (CAPTIVA) trial was designed to determine whether other combinations of dual antithrombotic therapy are superior to clopidogrel and aspirin.

Methods: CAPTIVA is an ongoing, prospective, double-blinded, three-arm clinical trial at over 100 sites in the United States and Canada that will randomize 1683 high-risk subjects with a symptomatic infarct attributed to 70-99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery to 12 months of treatment with (1) ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, then 90 mg twice daily), (2) low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily), or (3) clopidogrel (600 mg loading dose, then 75 mg daily). All subjects receive aspirin (81 mg daily), intensive risk factor management, and will undergo blinded CYP2C19 genotype analysis. The primary goal of the trial is to determine whether rivaroxaban or ticagrelor or both are superior to clopidogrel for lowering the primary endpoint (ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or vascular death) within 12 months. A prespecified interim safety analysis will be conducted when the first 450 randomized subjects have been followed for 12 months to evaluate the risk of major hemorrhage in the rivaroxaban and ticagrelor arms.

Results: Enrollment began in August 2022 and, as of 26 June 2024, the 450th subject was randomized into the study.

Conclusion: CAPTIVA is evaluating two alternative dual antithrombotic therapies to clopidogrel and aspirin to maximize the chance of establishing more effective antithrombotic therapy for symptomatic ICAS, one of the most common and high-risk cerebrovascular diseases worldwide.

Keywords: Intracranial arteriosclerosis; anticoagulants; antiplatelet; ischemic stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article:B.L.H., MD, MBA:Relevant: NIH, AstraZeneca is supplying ticagrelor and Janssen Pharmaceutical is supplying rivaroxaban for the CAPTIVA trial.Not relevant: University of Florida, NIH, and research support from the Brain Aneurysm Foundation and The Aneurysm and AVM Foundation. B.L.H. is an investor in FastWave, Galaxy Therapeutics, Kandu, Progressive Neuro, ProprioVision, and Solenic.M. I. C., MBChB:Relevant: NIH. Salary support as a multiple principal investigator for the ongoing NIH-funded CAPTIVA trial. AstraZeneca is supplying ticagrelor and Janssen Pharmaceutical is supplying rivaroxaban for the CAPTIVA trial.Not relevant: Medtronic (DSMB for subdural hemorrhage trial), Boehringer Ingelheim (stroke adjudicator for steatohepatitis clinical trial)S.D.Y., PhD:Relevant: NIHNot Relevant: journal Stroke (Statistical Editor)T.N.T., MD:Relevant: NIH, AstraZeneca (clinical event adjudication committee member)Not relevant: clinical event adjudication committee member for Novo Nordisk, Gore Inc., Occlutech, Horizon Therapeutics, LG Chem, Sanofi, and Areteia Therapeutics; and royalties from UpToDateK.R.P., MD:Relevant: NIHNonrelevant: Department of Defense. Industry-funded research through Toshiba America Medical Systems, Canon, and Banyan Biomarkers.L.H.C., PharmD:Relevant: NIHNonrelevant: NIH, Werfen (research support)J.P.B., MD:Relevant: NIHNonrelevant: Novo Nordisk (research support); Genentech (support for University of Cincinnati Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine); Roche, BrainsGate Ltd., Basking Biosciences, and the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee of Kroger Prescriptions Plans, Inc.R.H.M., R.M.B., S.M., L.B., J.S., A.M.W., N.S., C.U., and J.S.F.:Relevant: NIHNot relevant: none

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Trial flow diagram. When the first 450 randomized subjects have completed 12 months of follow-up, the safety analysis will determine whether either experimental arm (ticagrelor + aspirin or low-dose rivaroxaban + aspirin) demonstrates an excess risk of ICH and non-ICH major hemorrhage, using the historical rates from the SAMMPRIS trial as the comparator. If an experimental arm crosses the safety boundary, this will initiate an early futility analysis to weigh the risk: benefit ratio of the corresponding experimental arm. Otherwise, the futility analysis will be conducted after the first 842 subjects have been randomized, by comparing each experimental arm to the standard of care arm. If an experimental arm crosses the futility boundary, the corresponding experimental arm will be terminated. If neither arm crosses the futility boundary, the trial will continue with both experimental arms.

References

    1. Gorelick PB, Wong KS, Bae HJ and Pandey DK. Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: a large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier. Stroke 2008; 39: 2396–2399. - PubMed
    1. Holmstedt CA, Turan TN and Chimowitz MI. Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12: 1106–1114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 993–1003. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, et al. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet (London, England) 2014; 383: 333–341. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013; 44: 2064–2089. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources