Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 25;59(1):22.
doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09881-5.

Goals as Motives: Implications for Theory, Methods, and Practice

Affiliations
Review

Goals as Motives: Implications for Theory, Methods, and Practice

J David Pincus. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. .

Abstract

The concept of human goals is central to the study of psychology (i.e., motivation, behavior, and well-being), sociology (i.e., social structure, culture, and dynamics), education (i.e., setting objectives, student motivation, and growth strategies), management (i.e., leadership, employee motivation, productivity, organizational behavior), and economics (i.e., consumer and market behavior, decision making, labor relations), among others. Because it represents the ultimate desired destination that orients decisions and actions, it plays a central role in the theory and practice in these fields. Despite its centrality, the concept lacks theoretical consensus regarding its definition and distinctiveness from related concepts such as needs, motives, and values. Like these concepts, the goals literature suffers from the proliferation of both concepts and taxonomies, suggesting a need for a return to theoretical foundations. In this article, we advocate for a fundamental reconsideration of the concept of goals, anchoring it within a new psychological theory of human motivation based on first principles. The paper's primary contribution lies in demonstrating that the operational definitions utilized by academics and practitioners alike can be thought of as attempts to approach concepts of human motivation, specifically, emotional needs, without fully getting there. We review the leading definitions of human goals in the literature, concluding that they can be distilled to a fundamental set of human emotional needs, each associated with extensive literatures of their own. A comprehensive framework of 12 human emotional needs is introduced; it is argued that a comprehensive motivational framework offers significant advantages over current theoretical approaches, which tend to spin off an ever-expanding list of concepts. We consider the impact of embedding goals concepts within existing motivational constructs with clear benefits for: (a) theory development, (b) method development, and (c) practical applications, emphasizing the advantages of clear operational definitions.

Keywords: Emotional needs; Goals; Human goals; Motivation; Values; Well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Clinical Trial: No clinical trials were conducted as part of this research. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Quelle & Meyer.
    1. Aristotle. (1933). Metaphysics. Harvard University Press.
    1. Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 338–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338 - DOI
    1. Bagozzi, R. P., Baumgartner, H., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). The role of emotions in goal-directed behavior. The why of consumption (pp. 36–58). Routledge.
    1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.

LinkOut - more resources