Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Mar;42(3):721-736.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03389-6. Epub 2025 Jan 25.

Growth hormone improves the pregnancy outcomes in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: an umbrella review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Growth hormone improves the pregnancy outcomes in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: an umbrella review

Yongmei Liu et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Poor ovarian response (POR) significantly impacts the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART), and growth hormone (GH) has been proposed as an adjuvant treatment to improve outcomes in POR patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of GH in enhancing pregnancy outcomes, registering a protocol on PROSPERO and searching multiple databases up to September 2023. Twelve systematic reviews/meta-analysis and 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1984 patients were included. Quality assessment was performed using AMSTAR 2, GRADE, and RoB tools. The meta-analysis revealed that GH significantly increased live birth rates [OR=1.80, 95% CI (1.22, 2.64)] and clinical pregnancy rates [OR=1.92, 95% CI (1.51, 2.43)] compared to the control group. Subgroup analysis indicated that administering 5-10 IU/d of GH combined with a long protocol during the middle and late follicular stages maximized these benefits. Despite these promising findings, most outcome indicators exhibited low-quality evidence, highlighting the need for improved research standards to ensure solid evidence supports treatment strategies for POR, thereby promoting reliable application of GH in IVF treatments.

Keywords: AMSTAR-2; GH; GRADE; IVF-ET; POR; UR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias assessment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plots of GH co-treatment versus conventional IVF intervention (control): A live birth rate and B clinical pregnancy rate
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plots of GH co-treatment versus conventional IVF intervention (control): A number of collected oocytes and B number of embryos transferred
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plots of GH co-treatment versus conventional IVF intervention (control): endometrial thickness
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Funnel plots of primary outcomes in poor responders: A live birth rate and B clinical pregnancy rate

References

    1. Zhang Y, Zhang C, Shu J, Guo J, Chang HM, Leung PCK, Sheng JZ, Huang H. Adjuvant treatment strategies in ovarian stimulation for poor responders undergoing IVF: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(2):247–63. - PubMed
    1. Tarlatzis BC, Zepiridis L, Grimbizis G, Bontis J. Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9(1):61–76. - PubMed
    1. Jirge PR. Poor ovarian reserve. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016;9(2):63–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bentov Y, Yavorska T, Esfandiari N, Jurisicova A, Casper RF. The contribution of mitochondrial function to reproductive aging. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(9):773–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Bontis J, Tarlatzis BC. How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(3):749–66. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources