Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e090631.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090631.

How can cervical screening meet the needs of vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative study with stakeholder perspectives from seven European countries

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

How can cervical screening meet the needs of vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative study with stakeholder perspectives from seven European countries

Rikke Buus Bøje et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: This study explored and compared stakeholder perspectives on enhancements to cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women across seven European countries.

Design: In a series of Collaborative User Boards, stakeholders were invited to collaborate on identifying facilitators to improve cervical cancer screening.

Setting: This study was part of the CBIG-SCREEN project which is funded by the European Union and targets disparities in cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women (www.cbig-screen.eu). Data collection took place in Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania.

Participants: Represented stakeholders at various levels, including user representatives (vulnerable women), healthcare professionals, social workers, programme managers and decision makers.

Methods: 14 meetings lasting 2 hours each were held in these seven countries between October 2021 and June 2022. The meetings were audio or video recorded, transcribed and translated into English for qualitative framework analysis.

Results: We engaged 120 participants in the Collaborative User Boards. Proposed solutions targeted both provider and system levels. In all countries, fostering trusting relationships between vulnerable women and social or healthcare professionals, coupled with community outreach for awareness and access to testing was a consistent recommendation. Participants in Estonia, Denmark, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania advocated for tailoring healthcare services to meet the unique needs of vulnerable populations through a holistic approach. In Bulgaria and Romania, participants advocated for the need to secure free access, from screening to follow-up, and emphasised the need for organised screening with target population screening registries.

Conclusion: The study offers insights into stakeholders' recommendations for enhancing cervical cancer screening services for vulnerable women across seven European countries. Despite variations in the implementation level of population-based screening programmes, the imperative to optimise outreach and proximity work to improve cervical cancer screening resonated across all countries.

Keywords: Community-Based Participatory Research; Gynaecological oncology; Mass Screening; PUBLIC HEALTH; Primary Prevention; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

References

    1. Shin MB, Liu G, Mugo N, et al. A Framework for Cervical Cancer Elimination in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Roadmap for Interventions and Research Priorities. Front Public Health. 2021;9:670032. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.670032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bøje RB, Bardou M, Mensah K, et al. What are the barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative analysis of stakeholder perspectives in seven European countries. BMJ Open. 2024;14:e079921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079921. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maguire P, Sundseth H, Keenan L. European institute for women's health policy brief: European Institute for Women's Health; 2017. Women and cervical cancer in the EU.https://eurohealth.ie/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Cervical-Cancer.pdf Available.
    1. Chorley AJ, Marlow LAV, Forster AS, et al. Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. Psychooncology . 2017;26:161–72. doi: 10.1002/pon.4126. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramjan L, Cotton A, Algoso M, et al. Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening for women with physical disability: A review. Women Health. 2016;56:141–56. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2015.1086463. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types