Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 23:9:e64244.
doi: 10.2196/64244.

The Association of Psychological Factors With Willingness to Share Health-Related Data From Technological Devices: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Affiliations

The Association of Psychological Factors With Willingness to Share Health-Related Data From Technological Devices: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

Marijn Eversdijk et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Health-related data from technological devices are increasingly obtained through smartphone apps and wearable devices. These data could enable physicians and other care providers to monitor patients outside the clinic or assist individuals in improving lifestyle factors. However, the use of health technology data might be hampered by the reluctance of patients to share personal health technology data because of the privacy sensitivity of this information.

Objective: This study investigates to what extent psychological factors play a role in people's willingness to share personal health technology data.

Methods: Data for this cross-sectional study were obtained by quota sampling based on age and sex in a community-based sample (N=1013; mean age 48.6, SD 16.6 years; 522/1013, 51.5% women). Willingness to share personal health technology data and related privacy concerns were assessed using an 8-item questionnaire with good psychometric properties (Cronbach's α=0.82). Psychological variables were assessed using validated questionnaires for optimism (Life Orientation Test-Revised), psychological flexibility (Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire), negative affectivity (Type D Scale-14-Negative Affectivity), social inhibition (Type D Scale-14-Social Inhibition), generalized anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9). Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analyses, and network analysis was used to visualize the associations between the item scores.

Results: Higher levels of optimism (β=.093; P=.004) and psychological flexibility (β=.127; P<.001) and lower levels of social inhibition (β=-.096; P=.002) were significantly associated with higher levels of willingness to share health technology data when adjusting for age, sex, and education level in separate regression models. Other associations with psychological variables were not statistically significant. Network analysis revealed that psychological flexibility clustered more with items that focused on the benefits of sharing data, while optimism was negatively associated with privacy concerns.

Conclusions: The current results suggest that people with higher levels of optimism and psychological flexibility and those with lower social inhibition levels are more likely to share health technology data. The magnitude of the effect sizes was low, and future studies with additional psychological measures are needed to establish which factors identify people who are reluctant to share their data such that optimal use of devices in health care can be facilitated.

Keywords: health data sharing; health-related data; mobile phone; optimism; personality; privacy concerns; psychological factors; psychological flexibility; social inhibition; wearable health technology; willingness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Network correlation structure of all psychological measurements and willingness to share health technology data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afshin A, Babalola D, Mclean M, et al. Information technology and lifestyle: a systematic evaluation of internet and mobile interventions for improving diet, physical activity, obesity, tobacco, and alcohol use. JAHA. 2016 Sep;5(9) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003058. doi. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742–752. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Habibović M, Rollman B. Technological innovations in biobehavioral and psychosomatic medicine. Psychosom Med. 2023 Sep 1;85(7):565–567. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001240. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banerjee S, Hemphill T, Longstreet P. Wearable devices and healthcare: data sharing and privacy. Inf Soc. 2018 Jan 1;34(1):49–57. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2017.1391912. doi. - DOI
    1. Bayoumy K, Gaber M, Elshafeey A, et al. Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Aug;18(8):581–599. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00522-7. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources