Screening for schistosomiasis in a non-endemic setting: Accuracy of a rapid antibody test using finger prick blood
- PMID: 39864570
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102807
Screening for schistosomiasis in a non-endemic setting: Accuracy of a rapid antibody test using finger prick blood
Abstract
Human schistosomiasis is a chronic neglected tropical disease caused by blood flukes of the genus Schistosoma, infecting 250 million people worldwide, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa. Recently, thousands of cases have been reported in immigrants to non-endemic countries, including Italy. Serological screening is recommended but so far, no accurate point-of-care (POC) and lab-free test is available. We carried out a prospective evaluation of the accuracy of a new immunochromatographic test (Black- ICT, IgG-IgM) using finger prick blood for screening of schistosomiasis at the University Hospital of Bologna. Eligible immigrants were recruited regardless the presence of symptoms. The other tests used were microscopy on stools and urine, a serum-ICT (SCHISTOSOMA ICT IgG-IgM, LDBIO Diagnostics), an ELISA (NovaLisa Schistosoma mansoni IgG, Novatec) and a Western Blot (SCHISTO II Western Blot IgG, LDBIO Diagnostics). Statistical analysis was performed using a Bayesian latent class model. We enrolled 198 subjects in the study. Black-ICT had a sensitivity of 86.6 % (95 % credible interval 76.9-94.7) and a specificity of 88.4 % (82.0-94.3). At the estimated prevalence level for the study sample, 32.6 % (25.5-40.0), the positive and negative predictive values were 78.2 % (66.4-89.4) and 93.2 % (87.7-97.6), respectively. Good agreement was found with the other antibody tests, with the highest sensitivity being observed for serum-ICT (91.0 %, 84.7-96.4) and the highest specificity for ELISA (92.6 %, 87.5-96.7). The novel POC test for schistosomiasis showed satisfactory results and could improve the detection of this parasitic infection in non-endemic settings, as the lab-free approach could greatly expand the target group.
Keywords: Finger-prick blood; Immunochromatographic test; Schistosomiasis; Screening.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic study on an immunochromatographic rapid test for schistosomiasis: comparison between use on serum and on blood spot from fingerprick.BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 3;8(3):e019228. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019228. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29502091 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of a rapid immuno-chromatographic test (Schistosoma ICT IgG-IgM) for detecting Schistosoma-specific antibodies in sera of endemic and non-endemic populations.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 May 27;16(5):e0010463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010463. eCollection 2022 May. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022. PMID: 35622871 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of parasitological and immunological tests for the screening of human schistosomiasis in immigrants and refugees from African countries: An approach with Latent Class Analysis.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jun 5;11(6):e0005593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005593. eCollection 2017 Jun. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017. PMID: 28582412 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Schistosoma mansoni soluble egg antigen (SEA) for antibody detection and diagnosis of schistosomiasis: The need for improved accuracy evaluations of diagnostic tools.Acta Trop. 2021 Mar;215:105800. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105800. Epub 2020 Dec 23. Acta Trop. 2021. PMID: 33352167 Review.
-
Prevalence of strongyloidiasis and schistosomiasis among migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Feb;7(2):e236-e248. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30490-X. Lancet Glob Health. 2019. PMID: 30683241
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous