Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;13(1):55-77.
doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12723. Epub 2025 Jan 26.

Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review

Nicoleta Podină et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

The rising incidence of pancreatic diseases, including acute and chronic pancreatitis and various pancreatic neoplasms, poses a significant global health challenge. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) for example, has a high mortality rate due to late-stage diagnosis and its inaccessible location. Advances in imaging technologies, though improving diagnostic capabilities, still necessitate biopsy confirmation. Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning and deep learning, has emerged as a revolutionary force in healthcare, enhancing diagnostic precision and personalizing treatment. This narrative review explores Artificial intelligence's role in pancreatic imaging, its technological advancements, clinical applications, and associated challenges. Following the PRISMA-DTA guidelines, a comprehensive search of databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted, focusing on Artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and radiomics in pancreatic imaging. Articles involving human subjects, written in English, and published up to March 31, 2024, were included. The review process involved title and abstract screening, followed by full-text review and refinement based on relevance and novelty. Recent Artificial intelligence advancements have shown promise in detecting and diagnosing pancreatic diseases. Deep learning techniques, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have been effective in detecting and segmenting pancreatic tissues as well as differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Deep learning algorithms have also been used to predict survival time, recurrence risk, and therapy response in pancreatic cancer patients. Radiomics approaches, extracting quantitative features from imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, and endoscopic ultrasound, have enhanced the accuracy of these deep learning models. Despite the potential of Artificial intelligence in pancreatic imaging, challenges such as legal and ethical considerations, algorithm transparency, and data security remain. This review underscores the transformative potential of Artificial intelligence in enhancing the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes and survival rates.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; deep learning; endoscopic ultrasound; machine learning; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The process of study inclusion based on PRISMA methodology.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
A schematic drawing showing how a CNN model is analyzing pancreatic imaging data.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Situations representing different DICE scores: (a) No Overlap (DICE = 0) > the two areas do not overlap at all; (b) Partial Overlap (DICE < 1) > the circles overlap to some extent, leading to a DICE score between 0 and 1; (c) Complete Overlap (DICE = 1) > The circles perfectly overlap, resulting in a maximum DICE score of 1. The Hausdorff distance that indicates the maximum distance between the two sets as measured from their boundaries is also represented (red arrow).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
AI clinical applications for pancreatic diseases.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Iannuzzi J. P., King J. A., Leong J. H., et al., “Global Incidence of Acute Pancreatitis Is Increasing Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Gastroenterology 162, no. 1 (January 2022): 122–134, 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hegyi P., Párniczky A., Lerch M. M., et al., “Working Group for the International (IAP – APA – JPS – EPC) Consensus Guidelines for Chronic Pancreatitis. International Consensus Guidelines for Risk Factors in Chronic Pancreatitis. Recommendations From the Working Group for the International Consensus Guidelines for Chronic Pancreatitis in Collaboration With the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club,” Pancreatology 20, no. 4 (June 2020): 579–585, 10.1016/j.pan.2020.03.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jiang W., Du Y., Xiang C., Li X., and Zhou W., “Age‐Period‐Cohort Analysis of Pancreatitis Epidemiological Trends From 1990 to 2019 and Forecasts for 2044: A Systematic Analysis From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019,” Frontiers in Public Health 11 (June 2023): 1118888, 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1118888. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu J. X., Zhao C. F., Chen W. B., et al., “Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Epidemiology, Trend, and Risk Factors,” World Journal of Gastroenterology 27, no. 27 (July 2021): 4298–4321, 10.3748/wjg.v27.i27.4298. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang Z., Zheng X., Li M., and Liu M., “Improving the Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Insights From Epidemiology, Genomic Alterations, and Therapeutic Challenges,” Frontiers of Medicine 17, no. 6 (December 2023): 1135–1169, 10.1007/s11684-023-1050-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms