Bipartite interference and air pollution transport: estimating health effects of power plant interventions
- PMID: 39865699
- PMCID: PMC11823286
- DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxae051
Bipartite interference and air pollution transport: estimating health effects of power plant interventions
Abstract
Evaluating air quality interventions is confronted with the challenge of interference since interventions at a particular pollution source likely impact air quality and health at distant locations, and air quality and health at any given location are likely impacted by interventions at many sources. The structure of interference in this context is dictated by complex atmospheric processes governing how pollution emitted from a particular source is transformed and transported across space and can be cast with a bipartite structure reflecting the two distinct types of units: (i) interventional units on which treatments are applied or withheld to change pollution emissions; and (ii) outcome units on which outcomes of primary interest are measured. We propose new estimands for bipartite causal inference with interference that construe two components of treatment: a "key-associated" (or "individual") treatment and an "upwind" (or "neighborhood") treatment. Estimation is carried out using a covariate adjustment approach based on a joint propensity score. A reduced-complexity atmospheric model characterizes the structure of the interference network by modeling the movement of air parcels through time and space. The new methods are deployed to evaluate the effectiveness of installing flue-gas desulfurization scrubbers on 472 coal-burning power plants (the interventional units) in reducing Medicare hospitalizations among 21,577,552 Medicare beneficiaries residing across 25,553 ZIP codes in the United States (the outcome units).
Keywords: air pollution; causal inference; generalized propensity scores; network interference; power plants.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References
-
- Aronow PM, Samii C.. 2017. Estimating average causal effects under general interference, with application to a social network experiment. Ann Appl Stat. 11:1912–1947.
-
- Chestnut LG, Mills DM.. 2005. A fresh look at the benefits and costs of the US acid rain program. J Environ Manage. 77:252–266. - PubMed
-
- Doudchenko N, Zhang M, Drynkin E, Airoldi EM, Mirrokni V, Pouget-Abadie J.. 2020. Causal inference with bipartite designs. SSRN Scholarly Paper 3757188, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
