Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 31;11(1):e41584.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41584. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.

Humoral and cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in paediatric heart transplant recipients

Affiliations

Humoral and cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in paediatric heart transplant recipients

Amanda Bermejo-Gómez et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this prospective cohort study is to analyse the humoral and cellular vaccine responses in paediatric heart transplant recipients (HTR, n = 12), and compare it with the response in healthy controls (HC, n = 14). All participants were 5-18 years old and vaccinated with mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 between December 2021 and May 2022.

Methods: The humoral response was measured by quantifying antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-S). The T-lymphocyte phenotype and SARS-CoV2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell response was studied by multiparametric flow cytometry through peripheral blood mononuclear cells by the quantification of degranulation markers (CD107a) and intracellular cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2) after in vitro stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 peptides from structural proteins (S, M, N, E) and non-structural viral proteins.

Results: After vaccination, humoral response was found in all HTR, although they showed lower levels of anti-S IgG compared to HC (p = 0.003). However, in terms of cellular response, no significant differences were obtained in the prevalence of responders and magnitude of responses between groups. In addition, anti-S IgG levels directly correlated with a higher SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response (rho = 0.43; p = 0.027 and rho = 0.45; p = 0.02 for IFN-γ+ and TNF-α+ production of CD8+ T-cells, respectively). Activated T-cell phenotype in HTR was associated with a lower humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Conclusion: HTR had humoral response after vaccination, although they showed lower levels of specific anti-S antibodies compared to HC. There were no significant differences in the SARS-CoV2-specific cellular response between the two groups. Obtaining satisfactory data on this type of response could potentially challenge the current vaccine guideline recommendations.

Keywords: COVID-19; Cell-mediated immunity; Heart transplant recipients; Humoral immunity; Immunocompromised; Paediatric; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Humoral and cellular specific SARS-CoV-2 response after vaccination. Bar graphs representing anti-S IgG levels after vaccination in paediatric and adolescent heart transplant recipients (red; n = 12) and healthy controls (green; n = 14) (A). Dot plots representing the percentage of SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response (left) and rate of responders (right) within total and memory (CD45RA) CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell comparing heart transplant recipients and healthy controls after vaccination (B). Bar graphs representing anti-S IgG levels after vaccination in paediatric and adolescent participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (purple; n = 16) and without previous infection (orange; n = 10) (C). Dot plots representing the percentage of SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response (left) and rate of responders (right) within total and memory (CD45RA) CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell comparing participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and without previous infection (D). For C and D HTR and HC have been represented by squares and triangles, respectively. Abbreviation: HTR, heart transplant recipients; HC, healthy controls. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and rate of responders using X2 test. #0.05≤p-value<0.1; ∗p-value<0.05; ∗∗p-value<0.01. Only statistical p-value <0.1 is shown.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Association of SARS-CoV-2–specific anti-S IgG levels with T-cell response after vaccination. Correlation matrix presenting associations of anti-IgG levels with SARS-CoV-2-specific total and CD45RA CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells expressing CD107a+ and producing the cytokines IFN-γ+, TNF-α+ and IL-2+ in all paediatric and adolescent participants (n = 26), heart transplant recipients (n = 12) and healthy controls (n = 14) (A). Dots plots representing correlations between anti-IgG levels and SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T-cells producing IFN-γ+ (B) and TNF-α+ (C) in all participants. Abbreviations: HTR, heart transplant recipients; HC, healthy controls. The Spearman rho correlation coefficient test was used. #0.05≤p-value<0.1; ∗p-value<0.05; ∗∗p-value<0.01.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Association of SARS-CoV-2–specific anti-S IgG levels and SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell degranulation with phenotype expression markers on T-cells after vaccination. Dot plots representing correlations between anti-IgG levels and CD25+ expression on total CD4+ T-cells (A) and HLA-DR+CD38+ co-expression on CD45RA CD4+ T-cells (B). Dot plots representing correlation between SARS-CoV-2 specific degranulation marker CD107a+ on CD45RA CD4+ T-cells and CD25+ expression on CD45RA CD4+ T-cells (C) (n = 26). Correlations remained after excluding the outlier value (∗in blue) in each case (A–B). Heart transplant recipients are indicated in red and healthy controls in green. The Spearman rho correlation coefficient test was used.

Similar articles

References

    1. Velleca A., Shullo M.A., Dhital K., Azeka E., Colvin M., DePasquale E., Farrero M., García-Guereta L., Jamero G., Khush K., Lavee J., Pouch S., Patel J., Michaud C., Shullo M.A., Schubert S., Angelini A., Carlos L., Mirabet S., Patel J., Pham M., Urschel S., Kim K.-H., Miyamoto S., Chih S., Daly K., Grossi P., Jennings D.L., Kim I., Lim H.S., Miller T., Potena L., Velleca A., Eisen H., Bellumkonda L., Danziger-Isakov L., Dobbels F., Harkess M., Kim D., Lyster H., Peled Y., Reinhardt Z. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2023;42:e1–e141. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Danziger-Isakov L., Blumberg E.A., Manuel O., Sester M. Impact of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2021;21:925–937. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16449. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bansal N., Ovchinsky N., Foca M., Lamour J.M., Kogan‐Liberman D., Hsu D.T., Beddows K., Abraham L., Coburn M., Cunningham R., Nguyen T., Hayde N. COVID‐19 infection in pediatric solid organ transplant patients. Pediatr. Transplant. 2022;26 doi: 10.1111/petr.14156. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaudhry Z.S., Williams J.D., Vahia A., Fadel R., Parraga Acosta T., Prashar R., Shrivastava P., Khoury N., Pinto Corrales J., Williams C., Nagai S., Abouljoud M., Samaniego-Picota M., Abreu-Lanfranco O., Del Busto R., Ramesh M.S., Patel A., Alangaden G.J. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: a cohort study. Am. J. Transplant. 2020;20:3051–3060. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16188. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tschopp J., L'Huillier A.G., Mombelli M., Mueller N.J., Khanna N., Garzoni C., Meloni D., Papadimitriou-Olivgeris M., Neofytos D., Hirsch H.H., Schuurmans M.M., Müller T., Berney T., Steiger J., Pascual M., Manuel O., Van Delden C. First experience of SARS-CoV-2 infections in solid organ transplant recipients in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. Am. J. Transplant. 2020;20:2876–2882. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16062. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources