Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 23;11(2):e1749.
doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001749. eCollection 2025 Feb.

Association of a Liver Allocation Policy Change With Domestic Travel for Liver Transplantation

Affiliations

Association of a Liver Allocation Policy Change With Domestic Travel for Liver Transplantation

Katie Ross-Driscoll et al. Transplant Direct. .

Abstract

Background: In 2020, liver allocation policy in the United States was changed to allow for broader organ sharing, which was hypothesized to reduce patient incentives to travel for transplant. Our objective was to describe patterns of travel for domestic liver transplant pre- and post-acuity circle (AC) implementation.

Methods: Incident adult liver transplant listings between August 16, 2016, and February 3, 2020 (pre-AC) or June 13, 2020, and December 3, 2023 (post-AC) were obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We used previously defined geographic catchment areas to classify patients as (1) no travel, (2) travel to a neighboring region, and (3) travel beyond a neighboring region. We used multinomial logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with travel and cause-specific hazards modeling to estimate the association between travel and time to deceased donor transplant, stratified by model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and AC era.

Results: Among 83 033 liver candidates, 76% were listed in their home region. Black race, lower educational attainment, increased neighborhood social deprivation, and Medicaid were significantly associated with decreased odds of traveling beyond a neighboring region. After AC, traveling beyond a neighboring region was associated with an increased hazard of transplant for patients with a MELD score <15 (cause-specific hazard ratio [csHR]: 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.40), MELD score 15-24 (csHR: 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07-1.31), and MELD score 25-34 (csHR: 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.32).

Conclusions: Travel frequency, geographic patterns of travel, and characteristics associated with travel were largely unchanged after AC. Changes to allocation policy alone may not equalize patient means or desire to travel for transplant care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Net inflow of patients traveling beyond a neighboring TRR, by TRR, pre- and post-AC implementation.AC, acuity circle; TRR, transplant referral region.

Similar articles

References

    1. Burton AM, Goldberg DS. Center-level and region-level variations in liver transplantation practices following acuity circles policy change. Am J Transplant. 2022;22:2668–2674. - PubMed
    1. Wood NL, VanDerwerken DN, Segev DL, et al. . Logistical burden of offers and allocation inefficiency in circle‐based liver allocation. Liver Transpl. 2023;29:26–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wall AE, da Graca B, Asrani SK, et al. . Cost analysis of liver acquisition fees before and after acuity circle policy implementation. JAMA Surg. 2021;156:1051–1057. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed O, Doyle MBM, Abouljoud MS, et al. . Liver transplant costs and activity after united network for organ sharing allocation policy changes. JAMA Surg. 2024;159:939. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwartz A, Schiano T, Kim-Schluger L, et al. . Geographic disparity: the dilemma of lower socioeconomic status, multiple listing, and death on the liver transplant waiting list. Clin Transplant. 2014;28:1075–1079. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources