Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39867488
- PMCID: PMC11757226
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100927
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have shown benefits in improving cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and may mitigate symptom progression in myocardial infarction (MI). However, their effectiveness in patients with type 2 diabetes and MI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear.
Methods: To identify eligible studies, a comprehensive search of electronic databases, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Embase, was conducted from inception until May 2024. Results were presented as risk ratios (RR) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Our analysis included 8 observational studies comprising 24,229 patients. The results indicated that SGLT2i with PCI was associated with a significantly reduced risk of all-cause death (RR=0.61; 95 % CI=0.54 to 0.68), CV death (RR=0.46; 95 % CI=0.22 to 0.94), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR=0.80;95 % CI: 0.66 to 0.96), HF-related hospitalizations (RR=0.63; 95 % CI=0.44 to 0.90), stroke (RR=0.77; 95 % CI: 0.62 to 0.96) and acute kidney injury (RR=0.46; 95 % CI: 0.25 to 0.84) compared to PCI without SGLT2i use. However, the risk of revascularization remained comparable between the groups.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that SGLT2i with PCI in patients with type 2 diabetes and MI are associated with improved CV outcomes compared to PCI without SGLT2i use. Randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the improvement in outcomes with SGLT2i therapy combined with PCI in patients with MI and diabetes.
Keywords: Myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors; Type 2 diabetes.
© 2024 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Assessing the Effect of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor (SGLT2i) on Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2024 Jun 23;16(6):e62978. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62978. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39050303 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differential effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and renal outcomes according to renal function: a dose-response meta-analysis involving 10 randomized clinical trials and 71 553 individuals.Eur J Endocrinol. 2023 Jul 20;189(1):S17-S25. doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvad078. Eur J Endocrinol. 2023. PMID: 37474112
-
Cardiovascular, renal, and lower limb outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes after percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors vs. dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Jun 2;9(4):301-310. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad004. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023. PMID: 36639127
-
Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes-Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.Am Heart J. 2021 Feb;232:10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.064. Epub 2020 Oct 24. Am Heart J. 2021. PMID: 33214130
-
The Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiorenal Med. 2020;10(1):1-10. doi: 10.1159/000503919. Epub 2019 Nov 19. Cardiorenal Med. 2020. PMID: 31743918
Cited by
-
Regional and demographic variations in diabetes mellitus and myocardial infarction mortality among US adults: A retrospective observational analysis from 1999 to 2023.Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Jun 18;26:200456. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200456. eCollection 2025 Sep. Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025. PMID: 40606286 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reed G.W., Rossi J.E., Cannon C.P. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2017;389(10065):197–210. Jan 14. - PubMed
-
- Benjamin E.J., Virani S.S., Callaway C.W., Chamberlain A.M., Chang A.R., Cheng S., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67–492. Mar 20. - PubMed
-
- Byrne R.A., Rossello X., Coughlan J.J., Barbato E., Berry C., Chieffo A., et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(38):3720–3826. Oct 12. - PubMed
-
- Tsai T.T., Patel U.D., Chang T.I., Kennedy K.F., Masoudi F.A., Matheny M.E., et al. Contemporary incidence, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the NCDR Cath-PCI registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(1):1–9. Jan. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ritsinger V., Nyström T., Saleh N., Lagerqvist B., Norhammar A. Heart failure is a common complication after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes: a nationwide study in the SWEDEHEART registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(17):1890–1901. Nov. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous