Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):14-22.
doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_265_23. Epub 2024 Jul 10.

Pleiotropic effect of teneligliptin versus glimepiride add-on therapy on hs-CRP and cardiorenal parameters in Indian type 2 diabetes patients: An open-labeled randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Pleiotropic effect of teneligliptin versus glimepiride add-on therapy on hs-CRP and cardiorenal parameters in Indian type 2 diabetes patients: An open-labeled randomized controlled trial

M Kanimozhi et al. Perspect Clin Res. 2025 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to estimate the pleiotropic effect of teneligliptin on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels and some cardiorenal parameters in comparison to glimepiride, both as add-on therapy to metformin.

Methodology: This 12-week open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted among Indian people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and on metformin monotherapy with poor glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin >7% or 53 mmol/mol). The endpoints were mean change in hs-CRP levels, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), serum creatinine, blood urea, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and change in cardiovascular (CV) risk categories from baseline to end of 12 weeks.

Results: Seventy participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either teneligliptin 20 mg once daily (n = 35) or glimepiride 1 mg twice daily (BD) (n = 35) as an add-on to metformin 500 mg BD. The mean age of the participants was 50.65 and 50.7 years in arms 1 and 2, respectively. At 12-weeks end, teneligliptin add-on caused a statistically significant reduction in hs-CRP compared to glimepiride in both per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) sets. No significant difference was observed for changes in SBP and DBP, creatinine, urea, eGFR levels, and CV risk category in both PP and ITT sets.

Conclusion: Teneligliptin add-on resulted in favorable effects on hs-CRP levels and comparable effects on cardiorenal parameters compared to glimepiride add-on therapy at 12-weeks end.This trial has been prospectively registered in CTRI (Clinical Trials Registry of India). Registration number: CTRI/2021/08/035342.

Keywords: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors; glimepiride; high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; pleiotropic effects; teneligliptin; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flowchart. hs-CRP = High-sensitivity C-reactive protein
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Mean change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level from baseline to the end of 12 weeks (per-protocol [PP] set). (b) Mean change in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to the end of 12 weeks (PP set). (c) The proportion of patients in each cardiovascular (CV) risk category at baseline (PP set). (d) The proportion of patients in each CV risk category at the end of 12 weeks (PP set). hs-CRP = High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, CV = Cardiovascular, SBP = Systolic blood pressure, DBP = Diastolic blood pressure
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatter plot for correlation analysis of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with other study variables. CV = Cardiovascular, hs-CRP = High-sensitivity C-reactive protein

References

    1. Sapra A, Bhandari P. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. [[Last accessed on 2023 Jan 19]]. Diabetes mellitus. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551501/
    1. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th ed. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843. - PubMed
    1. Tandon N, Anjana RM, Mohan V, Kaur T, Afshin A, Ong K, et al. The increasing burden of diabetes and variations among the states of India: The global burden of disease study 1990-2016. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1352–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farmaki P, Damaskos C, Garmpis N, Garmpi A, Savvanis S, Diamantis E. Complications of the type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020;16:249–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kosiborod M, Gomes MB, Nicolucci A, Pocock S, Rathmann W, Shestakova MV, et al. Vascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes: Prevalence and associated factors in 38 countries (the DISCOVER study program) Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:150. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources