Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;41(1):147-150.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.1.9930.

Measurement of angle of progression by trans perineal-ultrasound in labour to predict mode of delivery in nulliparous women

Affiliations

Measurement of angle of progression by trans perineal-ultrasound in labour to predict mode of delivery in nulliparous women

Humaira Masood et al. Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess whether the measurement of the angle of progression in nulliparous women in labour can predict the mode of delivery.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi Medical University from 16th February to 25th March 2024. Nulliparous pregnant women in the active first stage of labour with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation were included in the study after taking informed consent. The angle of progression (AOP) was measured by trans-perineal ultrasound using the curvilinear probe. The primary outcome was the mode of delivery in relation to angle of progression.

Results: Seventy-eight patients were included in the study. Angle of progression was wider in patients who underwent vaginal delivery and narrower in patients who underwent cesarean section. AOP of 121 or more is associated with 86.6% of vaginal delivery and an angle of progression of 70 or less is associated with 83.3% of cesarean section.

Conclusion: The angle of progression is a reliable tool for predicting the mode of delivery. Wider angle is associated with vaginal delivery and a narrower angle is associated with cesarean section.

Keywords: Angle of descent; Angle of progression; Trans-perineal ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
Ultrasound image showing angle of progression.
Fig.2
Fig.2
Comparison between different angles of progression with mode of delivery.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O. Intrapartum fetal head position I:comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(3):258–263. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x. - PubMed
    1. Seval MM, Yuce T, Kalafat E, Duman B, Aker SS, Kumbasar H, et al. Comparison of effects of digital vaginal examination with transperineal ultrasound during labor on pain and anxiety levels:a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(6):695–700. doi:10.1002/uog.15994. - PubMed
    1. Nassr AA, Berghella V, Hessami K, Bibbo C, Bellussi F, Robinson JN, et al. Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in term singleton pregnancies:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(2):205–214.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.031. - PubMed
    1. Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG. 2011;118(1):62–69. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02775.x. - PubMed
    1. Usman A, Shafique M, Jalil J, Amin U, Zafar SI, Qamar K. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of transperineal sonography with the transvaginal ultrasonography in determining accurate cervical length. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2019;69(1):136–141.

LinkOut - more resources