Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 29:20:100962.
doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100962. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Microbial biopesticides: A one health perspective on benefits and risks

Affiliations
Review

Microbial biopesticides: A one health perspective on benefits and risks

Panqin Cai et al. One Health. .

Abstract

Controlling insect pests that destroy crop and spread diseases will become increasingly crucial for addressing the food demands of a growing global population and the expansion of vector-borne diseases. A key challenge is the development of a balanced approach for sustainable food production and disease control in 2050 and beyond. Microbial biopesticides, derived from bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa, or nematodes, offer potentially significant benefits for promoting One Health and contributing to several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This narrative review examines the benefits and risks of microbial biopesticides from a One Health perspective, focusing on the Americas and Europe, and aligned with respective SDGs. The value of biopesticides in sustainable agriculture and integrated pest management (IPM) approaches for food security, particularly SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 1 (No Poverty) has been widely recognized, with relatively fewer adverse effects to people and the environment than synthetic pesticides. With increased demand and usage, microbial biopesticides can be expected to contribute further to additional SDGs such as SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production) through waste recycling for biopesticide production and remediation of polluted ecosystems, and by reducing vector-borne disease burdens such as malaria and dengue. Nevertheless, the prudent and judicious application of microbial biopesticides is crucial to ensuring their effectiveness and maximizing their One Health benefits while minimizing pest resistance and unintended impacts. From a One Health perspective, this goal involves incorporating microbial biopesticides into a comprehensive biological control strategy within an IPM framework for sustainable agriculture and for controlling vector-borne diseases.

Keywords: Animal health; Biological control agents; Biopesticides; Crop pests; Environmental health; Food security; Integrated pest management; Integrated vector management; Mosquito control; Organic farming; Plant health; Public health; Sustainable agriculture; Vectored human diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of distinct types of pesticides - synthetic and biopesticides (adapted from [[9], [14], [15], [22], [28], [35], [49], [51], [52], [53]]).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Biopesticides – benefits and risks through a One Health lens, aligned with 8 UN Sustainable Development Goals.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PRISMA Flow Diagram for this literature review.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Infographic depicting the benefits and risks of using biopesticides in an urban environment through a One Health lens aligned with UN SDG.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ayilara M.S., Adeleke B.S., Akinola S.A., Fayose C.A., Adeyemi U.T., Gbadegesin L.A., Omole R.K., Johnson R.M., Uthman Q.O., Babalola O.O. Biopesticides as a promising alternative to synthetic pesticides: a case for microbial pesticides, phytopesticides, and nanobiopesticides. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1040901. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lahlali R., Ezrari S., Radouane N., Kenfaoui J., Esmaeel Q., Hamss H.E., Belabess Z., Barka E.A. Biological control of plant pathogens: a global perspective. Microorganisms. 2022;10(3):596. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030596. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rettinassababady C., Jeyalakshmi C. In: Microbial Diversity and Biotechnology in Food Security. Dubey N.K., Upadhyay R.S., Raghuwanshi R., Kharwar R.N., editors. Springer eBooks; 2014. Bio-fungicides: The best alternative for sustainable food security and ecosystem; pp. 401–411. - DOI
    1. Gaudana S.B., Bagchi T. In: Microorganisms in Environmental Management: Microbes and Environment. Satyanarayana T., Johri B.N., editors. Springer; Netherlands: 2011. Environmental impact from the use of Bt toxin; pp. 431–450. - DOI
    1. Vlaiculescu A., Varrone C. Pesticides in the Natural Environment: Sources, Health Risks, and Remediation. Elsevier eBooks; 2022. Sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives to reduce the use of pesticides; pp. 329–364. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources