Microbial biopesticides: A one health perspective on benefits and risks
- PMID: 39867997
- PMCID: PMC11762943
- DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100962
Microbial biopesticides: A one health perspective on benefits and risks
Abstract
Controlling insect pests that destroy crop and spread diseases will become increasingly crucial for addressing the food demands of a growing global population and the expansion of vector-borne diseases. A key challenge is the development of a balanced approach for sustainable food production and disease control in 2050 and beyond. Microbial biopesticides, derived from bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa, or nematodes, offer potentially significant benefits for promoting One Health and contributing to several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This narrative review examines the benefits and risks of microbial biopesticides from a One Health perspective, focusing on the Americas and Europe, and aligned with respective SDGs. The value of biopesticides in sustainable agriculture and integrated pest management (IPM) approaches for food security, particularly SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 1 (No Poverty) has been widely recognized, with relatively fewer adverse effects to people and the environment than synthetic pesticides. With increased demand and usage, microbial biopesticides can be expected to contribute further to additional SDGs such as SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production) through waste recycling for biopesticide production and remediation of polluted ecosystems, and by reducing vector-borne disease burdens such as malaria and dengue. Nevertheless, the prudent and judicious application of microbial biopesticides is crucial to ensuring their effectiveness and maximizing their One Health benefits while minimizing pest resistance and unintended impacts. From a One Health perspective, this goal involves incorporating microbial biopesticides into a comprehensive biological control strategy within an IPM framework for sustainable agriculture and for controlling vector-borne diseases.
Keywords: Animal health; Biological control agents; Biopesticides; Crop pests; Environmental health; Food security; Integrated pest management; Integrated vector management; Mosquito control; Organic farming; Plant health; Public health; Sustainable agriculture; Vectored human diseases.
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biopesticides: a Green Approach Towards Agricultural Pests.Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2024 Aug;196(8):5533-5562. doi: 10.1007/s12010-023-04765-7. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 37994977 Review.
-
A bibliometric analysis of biopesticides in corn pest management: Current trends and future prospects.Heliyon. 2024 Nov 6;10(22):e40196. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40196. eCollection 2024 Nov 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39748967 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The nexus between biofuels and pesticides in agroforestry: Pathways toward United Nations sustainable development goals.Environ Res. 2022 Nov;214(Pt 1):113751. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113751. Epub 2022 Jun 24. Environ Res. 2022. PMID: 35753369 Review.
-
Agricultural Pest Management: The Role of Microorganisms in Biopesticides and Soil Bioremediation.Plants (Basel). 2024 Oct 1;13(19):2762. doi: 10.3390/plants13192762. Plants (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39409632 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Use of Bacillus pretiosus and Pseudomonas agronomica for the Synthesis of a Valorized Water Waste Treatment Plant Waste as a Biofertilizer Intended for Quercus pyrenaica L. Fertigation.Biology (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;14(7):902. doi: 10.3390/biology14070902. Biology (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40723458 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ayilara M.S., Adeleke B.S., Akinola S.A., Fayose C.A., Adeyemi U.T., Gbadegesin L.A., Omole R.K., Johnson R.M., Uthman Q.O., Babalola O.O. Biopesticides as a promising alternative to synthetic pesticides: a case for microbial pesticides, phytopesticides, and nanobiopesticides. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1040901. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rettinassababady C., Jeyalakshmi C. In: Microbial Diversity and Biotechnology in Food Security. Dubey N.K., Upadhyay R.S., Raghuwanshi R., Kharwar R.N., editors. Springer eBooks; 2014. Bio-fungicides: The best alternative for sustainable food security and ecosystem; pp. 401–411. - DOI
-
- Gaudana S.B., Bagchi T. In: Microorganisms in Environmental Management: Microbes and Environment. Satyanarayana T., Johri B.N., editors. Springer; Netherlands: 2011. Environmental impact from the use of Bt toxin; pp. 431–450. - DOI
-
- Vlaiculescu A., Varrone C. Pesticides in the Natural Environment: Sources, Health Risks, and Remediation. Elsevier eBooks; 2022. Sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives to reduce the use of pesticides; pp. 329–364. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources