Integrated analysis of marked and count data to characterize fine-scale stream fish movement
- PMID: 39869162
- DOI: 10.1007/s00442-024-05639-3
Integrated analysis of marked and count data to characterize fine-scale stream fish movement
Abstract
Immigration and emigration are key demographic processes of animal population dynamics. However, we have limited knowledge on how fine-scale movement varies over space and time. We developed a Bayesian integrated population model using individual mark-recapture and count data to characterize fine-scale movement of stream fish at 20-m resolution in a 740-m study area every two months for 28 months. Our study targeted small-bodied fish, for which imperfect capture was accounted for (bluehead chub Nocomis leptocephalus, creek chub Semotilus atromaculatus and mottled sculpin Cottus bairdii). Based on data from 2021 individuals across all species, we found that proportions of immigrants in 20-m sections averaged 30-42% among the study species, but they varied over space and time. Creek chub immigrants increased during warmer intervals when individuals grew more and transitioned between body size classes, suggesting that immigration was due to ontogenetic habitat shifts. There was a weak pattern across the species that individuals were more likely to leave 20-m sections when flow was higher. Water-column species (bluehead chub and creek chub) were more likely to immigrate into and stay in deeper sections with more pool area. Across all species and occasions, number of immigrants to stream sections did not decrease with number of individuals that survived and stayed in the same sections. Thus, the habitat did not appear saturated, and our data provided no evidence that intra-specific interactions affected fine-scale movement at our fish densities. In conclusion, high turnover rates characterized fish movement among stream sections and their variation was associated with temporal and spatial shifts in abiotic conditions.
Keywords: Animal behavior; Cormack–Jolly–Seber models; Dispersal; Freshwater fish; Integrated population models; State-space models.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: There is no conflict of interest to declare. Ethical approval: The fieldwork was conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Clemson University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol Number 2014-047 and 2017-039).
Similar articles
-
Temperature variation generates interspecific synchrony but spatial asynchrony in survival for freshwater fish communities.Ecol Evol. 2023 Nov 12;13(11):e10700. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10700. eCollection 2023 Nov. Ecol Evol. 2023. PMID: 37964790 Free PMC article.
-
Fine-scale movement and habitat use of a prairie stream fish assemblage.Oecologia. 2018 Mar;186(3):831-842. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4073-y. Epub 2018 Jan 22. Oecologia. 2018. PMID: 29357029
-
Shifting thermal regimes influence competitive feeding and aggression dynamics of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus).Ecol Evol. 2022 Jul 4;12(7):e9056. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9056. eCollection 2022 Jul. Ecol Evol. 2022. PMID: 35813903 Free PMC article.
-
Individual based models for the simulation of fish movement near barriers: Current work and future directions.J Environ Manage. 2023 Jun 1;335:117538. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117538. Epub 2023 Feb 26. J Environ Manage. 2023. PMID: 36848809 Review.
-
Quantifying the contribution of immigration to population dynamics: a review of methods, evidence and perspectives in birds and mammals.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Dec;94(6):2049-2067. doi: 10.1111/brv.12549. Epub 2019 Aug 5. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019. PMID: 31385391
References
-
- Abadi F, Gimenez O, Ullrich B, Arlettaz R, Schaub M (2010a) Estimation of immigration rate using integrated population models. J Appl Ecol 47(2):393–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01789.x - DOI
-
- Abadi F, Gimenez O, Arlettaz R, Schaub M (2010b) An assessment of integrated population models: Bias, accuracy, and violation of the assumption of independence. Ecology 91(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2235.1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Albanese B, Angermeier PL, Dorai-Raj S (2004) Ecological correlates of fish movement in a network of Virginia streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61(6):857–869. https://doi.org/10.1139/f04-096 - DOI
-
- Arnold TW, Clark RG, Koons DN, Schaub M (2018) Integrated population models facilitate ecological understanding and improved management decisions. J Wildl Manag 82(2):266–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21404 - DOI
-
- Beumer LT, Schmidt NM, Pohle J, Signer J, Chimienti M, Desforges J-P, van Beest FM (2023) Accounting for behaviour in fine-scale habitat selection: a case study highlighting methodological intricacies. J Anim Ecol 92(10):1937–1953. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13984 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources