Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 3;40(6):779-790.
doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjaf020.

Prediction of hip fracture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography in older Swedish women

Affiliations

Prediction of hip fracture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography in older Swedish women

Raju Jaiswal et al. J Bone Miner Res. .

Abstract

The socioeconomic burden of hip fractures, the most severe osteoporotic fracture outcome, is increasing and the current clinical risk assessment lacks sensitivity. This study aimed to develop a method for improved prediction of hip fracture by incorporating measurements of bone microstructure and composition derived from HR-pQCT. In a prospective cohort study of 3028 community-dwelling women aged 75-80, all participants answered questionnaires and underwent baseline examinations of anthropometrics and bone by DXA and HR-pQCT. Medical records, a regional x-ray archive, and registers were used to identify incident fractures and death. Prediction models for hip, major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and any fracture were developed using Cox proportional hazards regression and machine learning algorithms (neural network, random forest, ensemble, and Extreme Gradient Boosting). In the 2856 (94.3%) women with complete HR-pQCT data at 2 tibia sites (distal and ultra-distal), the median follow-up period was 8.0 yr, and 217 hip, 746 MOF, and 1008 any type of incident fracture occurred. In Cox regression models adjusted for age, BMI, clinical risk factors (CRFs), and FN BMD, the strongest predictors of hip fracture were tibia total volumetric BMD and cortical thickness. The performance of the Cox regression-based prediction models for hip fracture was significantly improved by HR-pQCT (time-dependent AUC; area under receiver operating characteristic curve at 5 yr of follow-up 0.75 [0.64-0.85]), compared to a reference model including CRFs and FN BMD (AUC = 0.71 [0.58-0.81], p < .001) and a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool risk score model (AUC = 0.70 [0.60-0.80], p < .001). The Cox regression model for hip fracture had a significantly higher accuracy than the neural network-based model, the best-performing machine learning algorithm, at clinically relevant sensitivity levels. We conclude that the addition of HR-pQCT parameters improves the prediction of hip fractures in a cohort of older Swedish women.

Keywords: HR-pQCT; bone micro-architecture; fracture prediction; hip fracture; machine learning; osteoporosis.

Plain language summary

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by decreased bone strength, predisposing the affected to an increased fracture risk. The diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on the BMD examined by DXA, which is also used for fracture risk assessment. However, most fractures occur in individuals with non-osteoporotic BMD. Improvements in prediction have been made by considering additional risk factors in fracture risk assessment models. However, these models lack the direct consideration of microarchitecture and volumetric BMD, which recent studies have shown to be independent predictors of fracture. This study aimed to investigate the potential contribution of HR-pQCT to fracture prediction models using both traditional statistical methods and machine learning. The main fracture category of interest was hip fractures, the most severe fracture outcome in terms of morbidity and mortality. The study showed that hip fracture prediction was significantly improved by HR-pQCT compared to methods used clinically today. Future studies are warranted to confirm these results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. K.F.A has received lecture fees from Lilly, Meda/Mylan, and Amgen, all outside the submitted work. Dr. L.J. has received lecture fees from UCB Pharma, all outside the submitted work. Professor M.L. has received lecture or consulting fees from Astellas, Amgen, UCB Pharma, Medison Pharma, Jansen-Cilag, Viatris, Medac, and Parexel International, all outside the submitted work. All other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HR-pQCT parameters and incident fracture risk. The associations between HR-pQCT parameters and incident fracture risk are presented according to fracture category (hip, MOF, and any fracture) and HR-pQCT site (ultra-distal and distal tibia and ultra-distal radius and distal radius). The HRs (95% CI) per 1 SD increase in the HR-pQCT parameter are presented for models with 3 levels of adjustments, Model 1 (top line): adjusted for age and BMI. Model 2 (middle line): additional adjustments for CRFs (previous fracture, parental hip fracture, current smoking, oral glucocorticoids, rheumatoid arthritis, secondary osteoporosis, and alcohol intake). Model 3 (bottom line): additional adjustment for FN BMD. Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; Tt.Ar, total area; Ct.Ar, cortical area; Tb.Ar, trabecular area; Tt.BMD, total volumetric BMD; Ct.BMD, cortical volumetric BMD; Tb.BMD, trabecular volumetric BMD; Ct.Th, cortical thickness; Ct.Pm, cortical perimeter; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.1/N.SD, inhomogeneity of trabecular network; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; Ct.Po, cortical porosity; MOF, major osteoporotic fracture; CRFs, clinical risk factors. The associated data are presented in Table S2.

Similar articles

References

    1. Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002;359(9319):1761–1767. 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08657-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention D, and Therapy . Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA. 2001;285(6):785–795. 10.1001/jama.285.6.785 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lorentzon M. Treating osteoporosis to prevent fractures: current concepts and future developments. J Intern Med. 2019;285(4):381–394. 10.1111/joim.12873 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui LY, et al. BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(11):1947–1954. 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1947 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, et al. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam study. Bone. 2004;34(1):195–202. 10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.001 - DOI - PubMed