Discourse on measurement
- PMID: 39869800
- PMCID: PMC11804652
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2401229121
Discourse on measurement
Abstract
Measurement literacy is required for strong scientific reasoning, effective experimental design, conceptual and empirical validation of measurement quantities, and the intelligible interpretation of error in theory construction. This discourse examines how issues in measurement are posed and resolved and addresses potential misunderstandings. Examples drawn from across the sciences are used to show that measurement literacy promotes the goals of scientific discourse and provides the necessary foundation for carving out perspectives and carrying out interventions in science.
Keywords: error; measurement literacy; policy-making; scientific reasoning.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests statement:The authors declare no competing interest.
Figures
References
-
- Porter T. M., Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, 1996). - PubMed
-
- Chang H., Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Grants and funding
- 2145308/National Science Foundation (NSF)
- R01 AA030914/AA/NIAAA NIH HHS/United States
- 81XWH2110173/U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)
- DP190102160/Department of Education and Training | ARC | Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS)
- R01AA030914/HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- DP130101535/Department of Education and Training | ARC | Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Australian Research Council (CIBF)
- 2022 JHU Provost Discovery Award for Deception and Bad-Faith Communication/Johns Hopkins University (JHU)
- DP150101094/Department of Education and Training | ARC | Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS)
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
