Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;45(3):348-351.
doi: 10.1002/pd.6749. Epub 2025 Jan 27.

Chromosomal Aberrations in Fetuses With Isolated Persistent Right Umbilical Vein-A Nationwide Study

Affiliations

Chromosomal Aberrations in Fetuses With Isolated Persistent Right Umbilical Vein-A Nationwide Study

Cathrine Vedel et al. Prenat Diagn. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with isolated PRUV in a nationwide cohort with 1st-trimester screening for aneuploidies.

Method: A retrospective study including all pregnancies in Denmark with a due date between 2010 and 2022. We retrieved all cases from patient files, where we searched for "PRUV" in the conclusion field. All retrieved cases were manually assessed to determine if PRUV was present, associated anomalies were present, and genetic tests were performed including results. Additional data on postnatal genetics were retrieved from the Danish Cytogenetic Central Registry.

Results: A total of 262 cases with PRUV were retrieved, of which 19 (7.3%) had associated malformations. Among the isolated cases, 119 (49.0%) had a prenatal invasive genetic test that consisted of CMA, and 5 cases had an NIPT (2.1%): All tests were normal or showed low risk for aneuploidies, respectively. None of the children born with PRUV had a postnatal genetic test performed.

Conclusion: We found no chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with isolated or non-isolated PRUVs. Isolated PRUV does not seem associated with a higher incidence of chromosomal aberrations, so parents can be reassured. However, since PRUV was associated with other malformations in 7% of cases, thorough scans are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Number of prenatally detected cases of PRUV per year between 2010 and 2022.

References

    1. Massarwa A., Weissbach T., Hadi E., et al., “In‐utero Evaluation of the Fetal Umbilical‐Portal Venous System Among Fetuses With Persistent Right Umbilical Vein: Two‐And Three‐Dimensional Ultrasonographic Study,” Prenatal Diagnosis 44, no. 1 (2024): 68–76, 10.1002/pd.6494. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li J., Yuan Q., Ding H., Yang Z., Wang B., and Wang B., “Ultrasonic Detection of Fetal Persistent Right Umbilical Vein and Incidence and Significance of Concomitant Anomalies,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 20, no. 1 (2020): 610, 10.1186/s12884-020-03310-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dagdeviren G., Keles A., Yücel Celik O., Yucel A., and Sahin D., “Prenatal Diagnosis of the Persistent Right Umbilical Vein, Incidence and Clinical Significance,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 42, no. 3 (2022): 443–446, 10.1080/01443615.2021.1916811. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acherman R. J. and Evans W. N., “Persistent Right Umbilical Vein in Isomerism,” Prenatal Diagnosis 39, no. 13 (2019): 1220–1224, 10.1002/pd.5571. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toscano P., Saccone G., Di Meglio L., et al., “Intrahepatic Persistent Fetal Right Umbilical Vein: A Retrospective Study,” Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 34, no. 24 (2021): 4025–4028, 10.1080/14767058.2019.1702954. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources