Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 13:6:1519964.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1519964. eCollection 2024.

Support in digital health skill development for vulnerable groups in a public library setting: perspectives of trainers

Affiliations

Support in digital health skill development for vulnerable groups in a public library setting: perspectives of trainers

Lucille M B Standaar et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: The digitalization of healthcare poses a risk of exacerbating health inequalities. Dutch public libraries offer freely accessible e-health courses given by trainers. However, there is limited knowledge on whether these libraries successfully reach and support those in need. This study aimed to explore trainers' perspectives on the challenges, successes, and potential improvements in digital health skill education in a library setting.

Materials and methods: Trainers of the e-health course were interviewed. Topics included: the role of the library in digital health skills education, the successes and challenges in reaching groups with a low socioeconomic position, the perceived impact of the digital health skills education, and strategies for future improvement in digital health skills education. A deductive analysis based upon the interview guide topics was performed. A second inductive analysis was applied to identify underlying patterns. Coding was done independently and cross-checked. Codebooks and themes were determined in discussion with authors.

Results: Three themes emerged. 1) Trainers' services, skills and expertise: Trainers identified older adults, youth, people with low (digital) literacy, the unemployed, and people from non-native cultural backgrounds as the groups most in need of support. Trainers felt equipped to address these groups' needs. 2) The libraries' reach: improving engagement, perceived accessibility, and clients' barriers: Despite trainers' efforts to adjust the course to the target groups' level of commitment, digital and literacy levels, and logistics, the digital health course predominantly engages older adults. Experienced barriers in reach: limited perceived accessibility of the public library and clients' personal barriers. 3) Collaborations with healthcare, welfare and community organizations: Trainers emphasized that collaborations could enhance the diversity and number of participants. Current partnerships provided: reach to target groups, teaching locations, and referral of clients.

Discussion: Trainers in public libraries recognize a various target groups that need support in digital health skill development. The study identified three challenges: accessibility of the digital health course, reach of the public library, and clients' personal barriers. Public libraries have potential to support their target groups but need strategies to improve their engagement and reach. Collaborations with healthcare, welfare, and community organizations are essential to improve their reach to those most in need of support.

Keywords: digital divide; digital health; health education; health literacy; older adults; social services; socio-economic factors; vulnerable populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of described themes and subthemes derived from the trainers’ experiences in digital health skills education in a public library setting. Data was collected via semi-structured interviews (n = 14). Interviews were held with Dutch trainers in digital health skills who taught in public libraries.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Macevičiūtė E, Wilson TD. Digital means for reducing digital inequality: literature review. Inform Sci. (2018) 21:269–87. 10.28945/4117 - DOI
    1. Azzopardi-Muscat N, Sørensen K. Towards an equitable digital public health era: promoting equity through a health literacy perspective. Eur J Public Health. (2019) 29(Supplement_3):13–7. 10.1093/eurpub/ckz166 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Kessel R, Wong BLH, Clemens T, Brand H. Digital health literacy as a super determinant of health: more than simply the sum of its parts. Int Interv. (2022) 27:100500. 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100500 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ronquillo Y, Meyers A, Korvek SJ. Digital Health. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; (2024). - PubMed
    1. Al-Dhahir I, Reijnders T, Faber J, van den Berg-Emons H, Janssen V, Kraaijenhagen R, et al. The barriers and facilitators of eHealth-based lifestyle intervention programs for people with a low socioeconomic Status: scoping review. J Med Int Res. (2022) 24(8):e34229. 10.2196/34229 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources