Screening for comprehensive social needs in patients with cancer: a narrative review
- PMID: 39873703
- PMCID: PMC11917213
- DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf012
Screening for comprehensive social needs in patients with cancer: a narrative review
Abstract
Background: Patients with cancer who report social needs have worse quality of life, lower health-care access, and suboptimal health outcomes. However, screening for social needs does not happen systematically, and successful screening tools, strategies, and workflows have seldom been described. The downstream effects of screening including resource navigation have also not been well characterized. The objective of this narrative review was to fill these gaps.
Methods: Two investigators searched PubMed and Embase for studies that implemented a patient-facing social screening tool among patients with cancer between 2008 and 2023 using search terms including social screening, social needs, and cancer.
Results: We identified 19 articles that met study inclusion criteria. The most common tool used was the validated Health Leads Social Toolkit. Most often, screening tools were administered electronically, sent directly to patients, and captured needs at a single time point during a patient's diagnosis. Screening response rates ranged between 10% and 60%. Less than half of the studies described downstream resource navigation for patients who screened positive for social needs. Only 1 study evaluated the impact of screening on clinical outcomes and quality of life. Screening for patients who do not speak English or who belong to historically racial, ethnic, and gender minority groups was limited.
Conclusions: Screening for social needs has been shown to be feasible across delivery systems with numerous validated tools available. However, gaps remain in generalizability to diverse patient populations. Future work must identify how screening workflows can be successfully incorporated into routine clinical workflows.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors report no conflicts of interest related to this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Piloting a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Identify Patients With Social Needs and Provide Navigation Services and Referral to Community-Based Organizations: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 23;13:e57316. doi: 10.2196/57316. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 39042426 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well-being and care needs of people with cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 26;3(3):CD012387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012387.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30909317 Free PMC article.
-
Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of populations living with cancer attending outpatient treatment at a major metropolitan hospital in Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility trial.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 28;14(11):e080403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080403. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39613435 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Survival of Women with Breast Cancer. Overview Supportive Care Needs Assessment Instruments.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;989:281-284. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_25. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017. PMID: 28971436 Review.
References
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Measuring and addressing health-related social needs in cancer: working group recommendations. 2023. Accessed June, 15, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/docs/default-source/oncology-policy-program/hrsn-wg...
-
- Coughlin SS, Datta B. Housing insecurity among cancer survivors: results from the 2017 behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey. J. Cancer Policy. 2022;31:100320. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous