Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 3;9(2):pkaf012.
doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf012.

Screening for comprehensive social needs in patients with cancer: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Screening for comprehensive social needs in patients with cancer: a narrative review

Isabel Arana et al. JNCI Cancer Spectr. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with cancer who report social needs have worse quality of life, lower health-care access, and suboptimal health outcomes. However, screening for social needs does not happen systematically, and successful screening tools, strategies, and workflows have seldom been described. The downstream effects of screening including resource navigation have also not been well characterized. The objective of this narrative review was to fill these gaps.

Methods: Two investigators searched PubMed and Embase for studies that implemented a patient-facing social screening tool among patients with cancer between 2008 and 2023 using search terms including social screening, social needs, and cancer.

Results: We identified 19 articles that met study inclusion criteria. The most common tool used was the validated Health Leads Social Toolkit. Most often, screening tools were administered electronically, sent directly to patients, and captured needs at a single time point during a patient's diagnosis. Screening response rates ranged between 10% and 60%. Less than half of the studies described downstream resource navigation for patients who screened positive for social needs. Only 1 study evaluated the impact of screening on clinical outcomes and quality of life. Screening for patients who do not speak English or who belong to historically racial, ethnic, and gender minority groups was limited.

Conclusions: Screening for social needs has been shown to be feasible across delivery systems with numerous validated tools available. However, gaps remain in generalizability to diverse patient populations. Future work must identify how screening workflows can be successfully incorporated into routine clinical workflows.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors report no conflicts of interest related to this work.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Consort diagram describing study inclusion.

Similar articles

References

    1. Goel N, Lubarsky M, Hernandez AE, et al. Unmet social needs and breast cancer screening utilization and stage at presentation. JAMA Netw. Open. 2024;7:e2355301. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graboyes EM, Lee SC, Lindau ST, et al. Interventions addressing health-related social needs among patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024;116:497-505. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Measuring and addressing health-related social needs in cancer: working group recommendations. 2023. Accessed June, 15, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/docs/default-source/oncology-policy-program/hrsn-wg...
    1. Fan Q, Keene DE, Banegas MP, et al. Housing insecurity among patients with cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022;114:1584-1592. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coughlin SS, Datta B. Housing insecurity among cancer survivors: results from the 2017 behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey. J. Cancer Policy. 2022;31:100320. - PubMed