Results from the international collaborative systematic literature review informing the 2023 EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis
- PMID: 39874237
- DOI: 10.1136/ard-2024-226429
Results from the international collaborative systematic literature review informing the 2023 EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis
Abstract
Background: The EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) were updated in 2017, informed by a systematic literature review (SLR) completed in 2014.
Objectives: The aim of this new SLR was to provide the most up-to-date literature to underpin contemporary EULAR recommendations for the management of SSc.
Methods: 30 searches for 30 interventions (including several outcomes/clinical questions), and 1 dedicated search (with several interventions) for calcinosis were prioritised by the task force. Three types of questions were defined: type I questions, unchanged as compared with the previous recommendations; type II questions exploring interventions already mentioned in the previous recommendations but with new outcomes; type III questions for new interventions.
Results: 14 490 abstracts were retrieved from the databases on 31 March 2022 and 2021 abstracts were retrieved on 11 October 2022. 483 new full texts were evaluated and 172 new articles were included for the first search and 9 for the second search. The majority of the questions covered by this SLR explored new interventions (40% of type III questions) or new outcomes (26% of type II questions). New interventions included targeted therapies such as abatacept, Janus kinase inhibitors or nintedanib, and updated questions incorporated the results from key game- changing randomised controlled trials including trials on tocilizumab, mycophenolate or rituximab in SSc- interstitial lung disease.
Conclusions: This SLR provides and summarises the highest level of evidence for the new EULAR recommendations for the treatment of SSc, providing an unprecedented comprehensive overview of recent knowledge on SSc treatments and participating in defining the future research agenda.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests EB: grants or contracts from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) (master scholarship), support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly. TS: grants or contracts from Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim; support for attending meetings and/or travel from AbbVie. PGC: consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Eupraxia, Galapagos, Genascence, GSK, Grunenthal, Janssen, Levicept, Moebius Medical, Novartis, Pacira, Stryker, Takeda and TrialSpark; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis. YA: consulting fees from Topadur, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Galderma, Prometheus, Medsenic; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen, Horizon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sandoz; support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. FdG: grants or contracts from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim. AL, JČ, YAS and JE have nothing to declare.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical