Efficacy and safety of dapsone in adult primary immune thrombocytopenia
- PMID: 39874521
- PMCID: PMC12018975
- DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014939
Efficacy and safety of dapsone in adult primary immune thrombocytopenia
Abstract
To assess efficacy and safety of dapsone in adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a real-world cohort study were performed. Participants were adults with primary ITP, transient response to corticosteroids with/without intravenous immunoglobulin, and a platelet count of ≤30 × 109/L (or ≤50 × 109/L with bleeding). Patients in the RCT were randomized in arm A (prednisone × 3 weeks + dapsone for 12 months) or arm B (prednisone alone). The observational study involved dapsone initiation at 100 mg/d with standard follow-up. The primary end point was the response rate (platelet count of >30 × 109/L and ≥2× baseline level) at 52 weeks, with the response rate at 24 weeks and adverse events as secondary end points. The RCT enrolled 93 patients (54.8% female), with median age of 48.5 years (46 years in arm A; and 47 years in arm B). In the intention-to-treat analysis, 78.3% of patients in arm A discontinued dapsone after a median of 4.6 weeks because of adverse events (66.7%) or lack of efficacy (33.3%). The response rate at week 52 was 21.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9-36.4) in arm A vs 8.5% (95% CI, 2.7-18.6) in arm B (P = .17). The observational study, which was conducted after the end of the RCT, included 46 patients (52.2% female), median age of 50.7 years. Adverse events occurred in 30.4%, leading to discontinuation of dapsone in 23.9%, and 13.6% (95% CI 5.2-27.4) met the primary efficacy end point. Results from both studies showed an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio for the use of dapsone in adult primary ITP and suggest that, whenever available, second-line options should be used. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02627417 and #NCT02877706.
© 2025 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: G.M. reports honoraria and research funding from Amgen; reports honoraria from Argenx; reports honoraria and research funding from Grifols, Novartis, and Sanofi; and reports honoraria from Sobi, Alpine, and Union Chimique Belge. S.A. reports honoraria from Amgen, Argenx, Grifols, Novartis, and Sanofi; and received research funding from Novartis. L.T. reports honoraria from Alexion and Sobi; and consulted for Eusapharma. J.F.V. consulted for Eusapharma. L.G. consulted for Eusapharma and Amgen. S.C. reports honoraria from Novartis. M. Mahevas reports honoraria from Novartis and Amgen; and received research funding from Sanofi. B.G. reports honoraria from Novartis, Amgen, Sobi, and Grifols. M. Michel received honoraria for consultancy with, and speakers’ fees from, Alexion, Grifols, Novartis, Sanofi, and Sobi. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.
Figures
References
-
- Fromm E, Wittmann J. Derivate des p-nitrothiophenols. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges. 1908;41(2):2264–2273.
-
- Godeau B, Oksenhendler E, Bierling P. Dapsone for autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura. Am J Hematol. 1993;44(1):70–72. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
