In silico protein structural analysis of PRMT5 and RUVBL1 mutations arising in human cancers
- PMID: 39874873
- PMCID: PMC12395466
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2025.01.002
In silico protein structural analysis of PRMT5 and RUVBL1 mutations arising in human cancers
Abstract
DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) can be generated spontaneously during DNA replication and are repaired primarily by Homologous Recombination (HR). However, efficient repair requires chromatin remodeling to allow the recombination machinery access to the break. TIP60 is a complex conserved from yeast to humans that is required for histone acetylation and modulation of HR activity at DSBs. Two enzymatic activities within the TIP60 complex, KAT5 (a histone acetyltransferase) and RUVBL1 (an AAA+ ATPase) are required for efficient HR repair. Post-translational modification of RUVBL1 by the PRMT5 methyltransferase activates the complex acetyltransferase activity and facilitates error free HR repair. In S. pombe a direct interaction between PRMT5 and the acetyltransferase subunit of the TIP60 complex (KAT5) was also identified. The TIP60 complex has been partially solved experimentally in both humans and S. cerevisiae, but not S. pombe. Here, we used in silico protein structure analysis to investigate structural conservation between S. pombe and human PRMT5 and RUVBL1. We found that there is more similarity in structure conservation between S. pombe and human proteins than between S. cerevisiae and human. Next, we queried the COSMIC database to analyze how mutations occurring in human cancers affect the structure and function of these proteins. Artificial intelligence algorithms that predict how likely mutations are to promote cellular transformation and immortalization show that RUVBL1 mutations should have a more drastic effect than PRMT5. Indeed, in silico protein structural analysis shows that PRMT5 mutations are less likely to destabilize enzyme function. Conversely, most RUVBL1 mutations occur in a region required for interaction with its partner (RUVBL2). These data suggests that cancer mutations could destabilize the TIP60 complex. Sequence conservation analysis between S. pombe and humans shows that the residues identified in cancer cells are highly conserved, suggesting that this may be an essential process in eukaryotic DSB repair. These results shed light on mechanisms of DSB repair and also highlight how S. pombe remains a great model system for analyzing DSB repair processes that are tractable in human cells.
Keywords: Cancer genetics; Chromatin remodeling; DNA damage; Mutation; Protein structural analysis.
Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 1997;389(6648):251–60. - PubMed
-
- Downs JA, Gasser SM. Chromatin remodeling and spatial concerns in DNA double-strand break repair. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2024;90:102405. - PubMed
-
- Tabancay AP Jr. Forsburg SL: eukaryotic DNA replication in a chromatin context. Curr Top Dev Biol 2006;76:129–84. - PubMed
-
- Vagnarelli P Mitotic chromosome condensation in vertebrates. Exp Cell Res 2012;318(12):1435–41. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
