Assessment of safety and effectiveness after percutaneous closure for decannulation of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39878178
- DOI: 10.1177/11297298241312753
Assessment of safety and effectiveness after percutaneous closure for decannulation of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has emerged as a crucial component of critical care medicine, mainly as a lifesaving intervention for patients experiencing refractory cardiac arrest and respiratory failure.
Background: In the past, VA-ECMO decannulation was surgical and often associated with a high rate of periprocedural complications, such as surgical site infection, bleeding, and patient mobilization costs. To reduce the rate of these adverse events, many percutaneous techniques utilizing suture-mediated closing devices have been adopted. One of those devices is the Perclose Proglide® (PP).
Objective: This study's goal was to perform a systematic review to evaluate PP devices' success and complication rates for VA-ECMO decannulation.
Methods: To analyze the outcomes of PP in VA-ECMO decannulation, a systematic review of the most recent literature was conducted. The Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched up to September 2023. The National Health, Blood, and Lung Institute Study quality assessment tools were used.
Results: The final analysis included 10 observational studies comprising 418 patients. The efficacy of PP in VA-ECMO decannulation was 93.0% (95% CI 90.1%-96.0%). In 381 patients, the incidence of acute limb ischemia after VA-ECMO decannulation was 2.5% (95% CI 0.9%-4.%), the infection of the puncture site after decannulation was 1% (95% CI 0%-2%) in 385 patients. The incidence of patients with pseudoaneurysm after decannulation was 1.1% (95% CI 0.1%-2.1%).
Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the PP for achieving hemostasis after VA-ECMO decannulation, with a high success rate and low rate of major complications.
Keywords: Percutaneous closure; limb ischemia; mechanical circulatory support.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy, safety, and complications of manta vascular closure device in VA-ECMO decannulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Vasc Access. 2025 Mar 21:11297298251325391. doi: 10.1177/11297298251325391. Online ahead of print. J Vasc Access. 2025. PMID: 40119291 Review.
-
Assessment of percutaneous closure for decannulation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective study.J Vasc Access. 2024 Nov 24:11297298241300119. doi: 10.1177/11297298241300119. Online ahead of print. J Vasc Access. 2024. PMID: 39582214
-
Comparison of Success Rate and Complications of Totally Percutaneous Decannulation in Patients With Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 20;8:724427. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.724427. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34490310 Free PMC article.
-
Perclose ProGlide closure devices vs. surgical removal for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation: a meta-analysis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 28;12:1482305. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1482305. eCollection 2025. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 40094028 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes comparison between percutaneous decannulation with perclose ProGlide and surgical decannulation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Perfusion. 2023 Aug 8:2676591231194761. doi: 10.1177/02676591231194761. Online ahead of print. Perfusion. 2023. PMID: 37551692
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous