The prognostic impact of molecular classification in endometrial cancer that undergoes fertility-sparing treatment
- PMID: 39878279
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100024
The prognostic impact of molecular classification in endometrial cancer that undergoes fertility-sparing treatment
Abstract
Objective: No biomarkers are available to predict treatment response in patients with endometrial cancers who undergo fertility-sparing treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of molecular classification.
Methods: Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent fertility-sparing treatment with progestins between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Polymerase epsilon (POLE), TP53/p53, and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins were assessed to assign patients to molecular groups: POLE mutated (POLEmut), MMR deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and p53 abnormal (p53abn). Treatment response was classified as complete, partial, stable disease, or progressive. Response at 6 months, best response, and recurrence after complete response were evaluated by molecular class.
Results: In total, 33 patients were assigned to a molecular class and included in the analysis. Molecular testing detected 3 POLEmut (9%), 3 MMRd (9%), 25 NSMP (76%), and 2 p53abn (6%); 0 of 3 POLEmut (0%), 0 of 3 MMRd (0%), 6 of 25 NSMP (24%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) achieved complete response within 6 months. In terms of best response during the entire treatment period, 2 of 3 POLEmut (67%), 2 of 3 MMRd (67%), 18 of 25 NSMP (72%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) showed complete response. After complete response was achieved, 1 of 2 POLEmut (50%), 2 of 2 MMRd (100%), 14 of 18 NSMP (78%), and 0 of 1 p53abn (0%) had a recurrence.
Conclusion: Although the small number of patients limits our findings, a lower proportion of MMRd responded to progestins than of NSMP.
Copyright © 2024 European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and the International Gynecologic Cancer Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interests E.G.R. has received advisory fees, honoraria, travel accommodation/expenses, grants, and/or non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, GSK, Illumina, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Stemline Menarini, Sophia Genetics, and Thermo Fisher Scientific. The remaining authors reported no financial interests.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
