Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Oct;42(13):1729-1737.
doi: 10.1055/a-2527-4638. Epub 2025 Jan 29.

Improved Growth Velocity Using a New Liquid Human Milk Fortifier in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Improved Growth Velocity Using a New Liquid Human Milk Fortifier in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

Fernando Moya et al. Am J Perinatol. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare growth outcomes and tolerance among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants receiving a new, liquid human milk fortifier (LHMF-NEW) or a human milk fortifier-acidified liquid (HMF-AL).Retrospective, multicenter study of 515 VLBW infants in three regional neonatal intensive care units. The primary objective was to compare growth velocity (g/kg/d) during fortification between groups by repeated measures regression. Secondary outcomes of interest were feeding tolerance and the incidence of late-onset sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and metabolic acidosis. Student's t, analysis of variance, Wilcoxon, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for numeric variables, or chi-squared and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.No demographic differences were identified between the groups (HMF-AL, n = 242; LHMF-NEW, n = 273). Growth velocity during fortification was significantly higher in the group receiving LHMF-NEW, despite relatively similar total fluid, calorie, or protein intake (p = 0.001). Feeding intolerance was comparable between fortifiers. Necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis did not differ between groups and metabolic acidosis was diagnosed less frequently with the LHMF-NEW. Anthropometric measures at discharge and length of stay were comparable.Infants receiving human milk fortified with the LHMF-NEW had faster growth velocity during fortification, similar tolerance, and less metabolic acidosis compared with an earlier cohort of infants who received human milk fortified with an HMF-AL. · Among VLBW infants, using an LHMF-NEW resulted in a faster growth velocity in weight during several weeks of fortification than using the previous HMF-AL.. · The incidence of feeding intolerance (stopping feeds >8 hour) in any given week of fortification was low and not different between groups. Also, late-onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis were uncommon with no differences between groups, whereas the incidence of metabolic acidosis was lower in infants receiving the LHMF-NEW.. · No differences in length of stay or anthropometrics at discharge were identified..

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

F.M., J.F., and A.F. are part of Mead Johnson Nutrition Speaker's Bureau. F.M. is a recipient of grant funding from Mead Johnson Nutrition.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
( A ) Total fluid intake over the first 4 weeks of fortification for the groups receiving HMF-AL (blue) or LHMF-NEW (light blue) shown as median and 25 to 75 IQR, vertical lines represent the range. The total N per week of fortification is shown in the x -axis. There were no significant differences. ( B ) Total protein intake over the first 4 weeks of fortification for the groups receiving HMF-AL (blue) or LHMF-NEW (light blue) is shown as median and 25 to 75 IQR, vertical lines represent the range. The total N per week of fortification is shown in the x -axis. Significant differences in HMF-AL versus LHMF-NEW (median [IQR]): Week 1, 3.80 [3.53, 4.08] versus 3.63 [3.38, 3.90], p  < 0.001; Week 2, 4.22 [3.95, 4.43] versus 4.10 [3.75, 4.40], p  = 0.015; Week 3, 4.30 [4.00, 4.50] versus 4.16 [3.80, 4.40], p  = 0.006. ( C ) Total calorie intake over the first 4 weeks of fortification for the groups receiving HMF-AL (blue) or LHMF-NEW (light blue), shown as median and 25 to 75 IQR, vertical lines represent the range. The total N per week of fortification is shown in the x -axis. Significant differences in HMF-AL versus LHMF-NEW (median [IQR]): before fortification, 97.0 [89.00, 106.2] versus 99.05 [92.12, 108.77], p  = 0.017. HMF-AL, human milk fortifier-acidified liquid; IQR, interquartile range; LHMF-NEW, new, liquid human milk fortifier.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
( A ) Growth rate over the study period calculated with the exponential method. Comparisons of the growth velocity regression lines for the HMF-AL (blue) and LHMF-NEW (light blue) groups were done using a repeated measures regression (see Methods) only including infants who received either fortifier throughout the first 4 weeks of treatment ( N  = 308). Gestational age, fortifier group, location, and gender were incorporated into the model. ( B ) Changes in weight Z-score over time for the groups receiving HMF-AL (blue) or LHMF-NEW (light blue) are shown as median and 25 to 75 IQR; vertical lines represent the range. No significant differences were identified. HMF-AL, human milk fortifier-acidified liquid; IQR, interquartile range; LHMF-NEW, new, liquid human milk fortifier; SOF, start of fortification.

References

    1. Silveira R C, Corso A L, Procianoy R S. The influence of early nutrition on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Nutrients. 2023;15(21):4644. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiang K V, Sharma A J, Nelson J M, Olson C K, Perrine C G. Receipt of breast milk by gestational age—United States 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(22):489–493. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perrin M T, Belfort M B, Hagadorn J I et al. The nutritional composition and energy content of donor human milk: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(04):960–970. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Section on Breastfeeding, Committee on Nutrition, Committee on Fetus and Newborn . Parker M G, Stellwagen L M, Noble L, Kim J H, Poindexter B B, Puopolo K M. Promoting human milk and breastfeeding for the very low birth weight infant. Pediatrics. 2021;148(05):e2021054272. - PubMed
    1. Arslanoglu S, Boquien C Y, King C et al. Fortification of human milk for preterm infants: update and recommendations of the European Milk Bank Association (EMBA) Working Group on human milk fortification. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:76. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types