Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 29;16(12):e76600.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.76600. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Percutaneous Pinning for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Insights From a Five-Year Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Percutaneous Pinning for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Insights From a Five-Year Retrospective Study

Abobaker Younis et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction: Proximal humerus fractures are a common orthopedic challenge, particularly in older adults. Percutaneous pinning, a minimally invasive technique, aims to stabilize fractures while preserving soft tissue integrity. This study evaluates the functional and radiological outcomes of patients treated with percutaneous pinning at a single center over five years.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent percutaneous pinning for proximal humerus fractures between 2018 and 2023. Of 15 identified patients, 13 met the inclusion criteria of completing at least a three-month follow-up. Data were extracted from clinical records and radiological assessments, focusing on demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, complications, and functional outcomes.

Results: The study included 13 patients, of whom 12 (92%) were female, with a mean age of 60 years (range: 12-73 years). Most fractures (12/13, 92%) were three-part injuries resulting from low-energy trauma (11/13, 85%). All procedures were performed by a consultant shoulder specialist, using a combination of two to three K-wires with suture anchors. Anatomical alignment was achieved postoperatively in 10 (77%) cases, and radiological healing was observed in 10 (77%) by four weeks. At final follow-up, 12 (92%) patients demonstrated either excellent (9/13, 69%) or good alignment (3/13, 23%). Functionally, 11 (85%) patients reported either no pain (9/13, 69%) or mild pain (2/13, 15%). Similarly, 11 (85%) achieved either full functionality (8/13, 62%) or functionality with mild limitations (3/13, 23%) in arm use, with eight (62%) demonstrating a good range of motion. Complications were minimal, with no adverse events in nine (69%) cases. Early pin loosening occurred in three (23%) patients, and one (8%) required wire removal due to significant displacement. Follow-up duration ranged from three to 15 months (mean: 7.5 months), with patients attending an average of five clinic visits.

Conclusion: Percutaneous pinning provides reliable outcomes for selected proximal humerus fractures, yielding high rates of functional recovery and favorable radiological results. The use of suture anchors is particularly important for stabilizing the greater tuberosity and ensuring calcar support. With most patients experiencing satisfactory pain relief, functional use, and alignment, this minimally invasive approach demonstrates its efficacy and safety.

Keywords: ireland; k-wires; minimally invasive fixation; percutaneous pinning; proximal humerus fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. University Hospital Galway Clinical Audit Committee issued approval 546. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Similar articles

References

    1. [Percutaneous pinning for proximal humerus fractures] Alexa O, Puha B, Veliceasa B, Popia I. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17595865/ Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2007;111:184–189. - PubMed
    1. Percutaneous pinning of the proximal humerus. Ebraheim N, Wong FY, Biyani A. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8831894/ Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 1996;25:500, 501, 506. - PubMed
    1. Long term results of philos plating and percutaneous k-wire fixation in proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. Jaura G, Sikdar J, Singh S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25279077/ Malays Orthop J. 2014;8:4–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Five-year follow-up results of the PROFHER trial comparing operative and non-operative treatment of adults with a displaced fracture of the proximal humerus. Handoll HH, Keding A, Corbacho B, Brealey SD, Hewitt C, Rangan A. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B:383–392. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Displaced fragility fractures of proximal humerus in elderly patients affected by severe comorbidities: percutaneous fixation and conservative treatment. Innocenti M, Carulli C, Civinini R, Matassi F, Tani M, Muncibì F. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2013;25:447–452. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources