Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 30;333(13):1150-1160.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.26886. Online ahead of print.

Adjuvant Atezolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations

Adjuvant Atezolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 Randomized Clinical Trial

Michail Ignatiadis et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive subtype with a high incidence in young patients, a high incidence in non-Hispanic Black women, and a high risk of progression to metastatic cancer, a devastating sequela with a 12- to 18-month life expectancy. Until recently, one strategy for treating early-stage triple-negative breast cancer was chemotherapy after surgery. However, it was not known whether the addition of immune therapy to postsurgery chemotherapy would be beneficial.

Objective: To evaluate the addition of immune therapy in the form of atezolizumab to postoperative chemotherapy in patients with the high-risk triple-negative breast cancer subtype.

Design, setting, and participants: In this open-label international randomized phase 3 trial conducted in more than 330 centers in 31 countries, patients undergoing surgery as initial treatment for stage II or III triple-negative breast cancer were enrolled between August 2, 2018, and November 11, 2022. The last patient follow-up was on August 18, 2023.

Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive standard chemotherapy for 20 weeks with (n = 1101) or without (n = 1098) the immune therapy drug atezolizumab for up to 1 year.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (time between randomization and invasive breast cancer in the same or opposite breast, recurrence elsewhere in the body, or death from any cause).

Results: The median age of enrolled patients was 53 years and most self-reported as being of Asian or White race and neither Latino nor Hispanic ethnicity. The study independent data monitoring committee halted enrollment at 2199 of 2300 planned patients. All patients stopped atezolizumab following a planned early interim and futility analysis. The trial continued to a premature final analysis. With invasive disease-free survival events in 141 patients (12.8%) treated with atezolizumab-chemotherapy and 125 (11.4%) with chemotherapy alone (median follow-up, 32 months), the final stratified invasive disease-free survival hazard ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.87-1.42; P = .38). Compared with chemotherapy alone, the regimen of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy was associated with more treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (54% vs 44%) but similar incidences of fatal adverse events (0.8% vs 0.6%) and adverse events leading to chemotherapy discontinuation. Chemotherapy exposure was similar in the 2 treatment groups.

Conclusions and relevance: The addition of the immune therapy drug atezolizumab to chemotherapy after surgery did not provide benefit among patients with triple-negative breast cancer who are at high risk of recurrent disease.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03498716.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ignatiadis reported receiving grants to his institution from Roche, Pfizer, Natera, and Inivata and serving as a consultant for Daiichi, Seattle Genetics, AstraZeneca, Menarini/Stemline, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, and Rejuveron Senescence Therapeutics. Dr McArthur reported receiving grants to her institution from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck and personal fees from Novartis, Gilead, Pfizer, Lilly, Merck, Moderna, Daiichi-Sankyo, Seattle Genetics, Crown Bioscience, Puma Biotechnology, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca. Dr El-abed reported receiving grants through her institution from AstraZeneca, Roche-Genentech, Tesaro, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, Biovica, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi-Aventis and having a patent for MammaPrint. Dr de Azambuja reported receiving support to his institution from Roche for the conduct of the trial; personal fees from Roche-Genentech, Novartis, SeaGen, Zodiac, Libbs, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Gilead Sciences outside the submitted work; and travel grants from AstraZeneca and Gilead. Dr Chui reported having been an employee of, owning stock in, and being named on a pending patent through Roche-Genentech and being a current employee of and owning stock in Revolution Medicines. Dr Dieterich reported being an employee of and owning stock in F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Dr Shearer-Kang reported being an employee of Roche-Genentech. Dr Molinero reported being an employee of and owning stock in Roche-Genentech. Dr Steger reported receiving personal fees from Roche Austria during the conduct of the study and nonfinancial support from Roche Austria outside the submitted work. Dr Jassem reported receiving personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Novartis and travel fees from Pfizer and Takeda. Dr Lee reported receiving speaker fees from and serving on an advisory board of Roche during the conduct of the study; receiving research grants and speaker fees from and serving on an advisory board of MSD outside the submitted work. Dr Higgins reported receiving travel and conference fee support from Roche. Dr Schmidt reported receiving grants from the German Breast Group during and outside the conduct of the study; personal fees from AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead, Lilly, Menarini Stemline, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Roche; and having patents for EP 2390370 B1 and EP 2951317 B1 issued to University Medical Center Mainz. Dr Guerrero Zotano reported receiving personal fees from Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Menarini, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Palex. Dr Moscetti reported receiving personal fees from Gilead, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Pfizer, and Roche. Dr Munzone reported receiving personal fees from Exact Sciences, MSD Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo–AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Ipsen, and Seagen, and nonfinancial support from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Gilead Sciences, Pierre Fabre, and Astra Zeneca. Dr Ohno reported receiving personal fees from Chugai, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, and Kyowa Kirin. Dr Im reported receiving grants from Roche, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Daewoong Pharm, Pfizer, and Boryung Pharm and serving as an advisor to Novartis, Roche, MSD, and Lilly. Dr Werutsky reported receiving grants from Roche during the conduct of the study and honoraria, consulting, and speaking fees from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Daiichi, and AstraZeneca. Dr Gal-Yam reported receiving personal fees from Roche, MSD, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Gilead, and Lilly. Dr Gonzalez Farre reported receiving personal fees from Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, and Gilead and nonfinancial support from Lilly. Dr Jacot reported receiving grants from AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Lilly, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Seagen, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankyo and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, Eisai, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Eli illy, Chugai, and Gilead. Dr Gluz reported receiving personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Exact Science, Agendia, Daiichi Sankyo, and the West German Study Group. Dr Cameron reported receiving to his institution fees for speaking and serving on an advisory board and an independent monitoring committee of Roche. Dr Viale reported serving on the advisory boards of Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer and receiving consulting fees from Agilent and lecture fees from Gilead. Dr Saji reported receiving grants from Chugai, Taiho, Eisai, Takeda, MSD, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Lilly, and Sanofi and personal fees from Chugai, Kyowa Kirin, NSD, Novartis, Eisai, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Taiho, Ono, Nippon Kayaku, Gilead, and Exact Sciences. Dr Gelber reported receiving grants to his institution from Roche, AstraZeneca, and Merck. Dr Piccart reported receiving personal fees from the Oncolytics scientific board; consulting fees from AstraZeneca Gilead, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Seagen, NBE Therapeutics, and Frame Therapeutics; and grants from Servier, Synthon, AstraZeneca, Radius, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, and Gilead. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Recruitment, Randomization, and Follow-Up in the ALEXANDRA/IMpassion030 Trial
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Final Analysis of Invasive Disease–Free Survival in the Intention-to-Treat Population
The hazard ratio was estimated by stratified Cox regression analysis with the following strata: axillary nodal status, surgery (breast conserving vs mastectomy), and tumor programmed death ligand 1 status. The P value was estimated by a stratified log-rank test. The median follow-up was 32.3 (IQR, 22.3-41.3) months for atezolizumab plus chemotherapy and 31.9 (IQR, 22.5-41.2) months for chemotherapy alone. The Kaplan-Meier plot is truncated at 48 months, when 165 patients (<8%) remained in follow-up.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Final Unstratified Analysis of Invasive Disease–Free Survival in Key Subgroups, With Hazard Ratios Estimated by Unstratified Cox Regression
The dashed line represents the hazard ratio for all patients. AJCC indicates American Joint Commission on Cancer; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IC, immune cell; iXRS, interactive voice- or web-based response system; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1.

Comment in

  • doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.26811

References

    1. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(15 pt 1):4429-4434. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basmadjian RB, Chow K, Kim D, et al. The association between early-onset diagnosis and clinical outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(7):1923. doi: 10.3390/cancers15071923 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vuong B, Jacinto AI, Chang SB, Kuehner GE, Savitz AC. Contemporary review of the management and treatment of young breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer. 2024;24(8):663-675. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.06.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aldrich J, Canning M, Bhave M. Monitoring of triple negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Breast Cancer. 2023;23(8):832-834. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.08.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pederson HJ, Al-Hilli Z, Kurian AW. Racial disparities in breast cancer risk factors and risk management. Maturitas. 2024;184:107949. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107949 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data