Ultra-Low-Field Portable Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Devices: Current Evidence and Future Directions
- PMID: 39883859
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002368
Ultra-Low-Field Portable Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Devices: Current Evidence and Future Directions
Abstract
The use of cardiac devices, including mechanical circulatory support (MCS), cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), and pacing wires, has increased and significantly improved survival in patients with severe cardiac failure. However, these devices are frequently associated with acute brain injuries (ABIs) including ischemic strokes, intracranial hemorrhages, seizures, and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury which contribute substantially to morbidity and mortality. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the standard imaging modalities for ABI diagnosis, can pose significant challenges in this patient population due to the risks associated with patient transportation and the incompatibility of ferromagnetic components of certain cardiac devices with high magnetic field of the MRI. This review discusses the application of Ultralow-field portable MRI (ULF-pMRI), which operates at much lower magnetic field (0.064 T), with the potential to allow safe bedside imaging of critically ill patients. In this review, we detail the clinical studies and research findings defining the safety, feasibility, and diagnostic utility of ULF-pMRI in detecting ABI in the critically ill. We further discuss the potential broader applications of ULF-pMRI, as a standard diagnostic tool for neurocritical care in patients with cardiac devices. The integration of such technology into current practice promises to enhance diagnostic accuracy, improve patient outcomes, and optimize healthcare resources.
Copyright © ASAIO 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
-
- Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, et al.: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association|Circulation. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757 . Accessed April 20, 2024. - DOI
-
- Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al.; Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) Study Group: Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 345: 1435–1443, 2001.
-
- Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al.: Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 374: 1351–1363, 2009.
-
- Aktaa S, Abdin A, Arbelo E, et al.: European Society of Cardiology Quality Indicators for the care and outcomes of cardiac pacing: Developed by the Working Group for Cardiac Pacing Quality Indicators in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Europace. 24: 165–172, 2022.
-
- Shoskes A, Whitman G, Cho SM: Neurocritical care of mechanical circulatory support devices. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 21: 20, 2021.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
