Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;51(5):109600.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109600. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

Optimal oesophagogastric anastomosis techniques for oesophageal cancer surgery - A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Affiliations
Free article

Optimal oesophagogastric anastomosis techniques for oesophageal cancer surgery - A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Matthew G Davey et al. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 May.
Free article

Abstract

Background: The optimal oesophagogastric anastomosis technique for oesophageal cancer surgery remains unclear. The aim of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to compare oesophagogastric anastomosis techniques for oesophageal cancer surgery.

Methods: A systematic review and NMA were performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines-NMA extension. Statistical analyses were performed using R and Shiny.

Results: Overall, 16 RCTs were included (14 provided data eligible for NMA). These included 2520 patients and 4 different anastomosis techniques: 1055 (41.9 %) patients underwent circular stapled (CS), 1232 (48.9 %) underwent handsewn (HS), 100 (3.9 %) underwent triangulated stapled (TS) and 133 (5.3 %) underwent linear stapled (LS). Fourteen studies reported on open surgery, while one reported on both open and minimally invasive techniques. At NMA, no significant difference was observed regarding anastomotic leak rates among all techniques, while HS significantly reduced anastomotic leaks following cervical technique (odds ratio (OR): 0.32, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.13-0.78). Moreover, HS (OR: 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.38-0.90) and LS (OR: 0.21, 95%CI: 0.06-0.71) significantly reduced anastomotic stricture rates, while LS significantly reduced anastomotic strictures following intrathoracic anastomotic technique (OR: 0.17, 95%CI: 0.06-0.90).

Conclusion: HS reduced anastomotic leaks following cervical anastomoses, while HS and LS reduced overall anastomotic strictures (with LS significantly reducing strictures following intrathoracic anastomoses). Importantly, institutional and surgeon expertise should be considered prior to adopting these results into contemporary practice for open oesphagectomy, with a call for the harmonisation of trials to align with contemporary, minimally invasive approaches.

Keywords: Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic techniques; Oesophageal cancer surgery; Oesophagectomy; Surgical oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest statement NONE OF THE AUTHORS HAVE ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST TO DISCLOSE.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources