Improving UK data on avoidable perinatal brain injury: review of data dictionaries and consultation
- PMID: 39885238
- DOI: 10.1038/s41390-025-03842-3
Improving UK data on avoidable perinatal brain injury: review of data dictionaries and consultation
Erratum in
-
Correction: Improving UK data on avoidable perinatal brain injury: review of data dictionaries and consultation.Pediatr Res. 2025 Jun;97(7):2491. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-03949-7. Pediatr Res. 2025. PMID: 39994337 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: High quality data is important to understanding epidemiology and supporting improvement efforts in perinatal brain injury. It is not clear which data items relevant to brain injury are captured across UK sources of routinely collected data, nor what needs to be done to ensure that those sources are fit for purpose in improving care.
Methods: We reviewed data dictionaries of four main UK perinatal data sources and consulted a multi-professional group (N = 27) with expertise in neonatal/maternity care, statistics, and clinical negligence.
Results: None of the data sources we reviewed currently captures, on its own, the range of items relevant to brain injury. Data items lack common definitions and ongoing linkage across the different sources. Our consultation identified the need for standardising the definition of avoidable perinatal brain injury, resolving inconsistencies in capturing data, improving linkage of data across existing data sources, and co-designing a strategy for meaningful use of data.
Conclusions: Limited standardisation and linkage across UK data sources are key problems in using data to guide improvement efforts aimed at reducing risk of avoidable perinatal brain injury. A programme involving co-design with healthcare professionals and families to improve capture and use of data is now needed.
Impact: Limited standardisation and linkage across UK data sources currently challenge the use of data as the basis of efforts to reduce risk of avoidable perinatal brain injury. A harmonisation programme involving consultation and co-design with healthcare professionals, families, and other specialists is needed to enable better capture and use of data in this key area. There is need to standardise the definition of avoidable perinatal brain injury, resolve inconsistencies in capturing data, improve linkage of data collected across existing data sources, and co-design a strategy for meaningful use of data.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Patient consent was not required, as they were not involved in the conduct of this study. The UK’s Health Research Authority decision tool ( http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/ ) showed that ethics approval was not required for the multi-professional consultation, as it was classified as a quality improvement activity, in which all of the participants were invited to join the authorship group and to be acknowledged in the project’s outputs. Participants were provided with information about the consultation, had the possibility to ask questions and withdraw their involvement at any time, and gave their written consent to take part and agree to recording of this quality improvement activity (including giving permission to publish anonymised quotes and synthesis of their expressed views).
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Correction: Improving UK data on avoidable perinatal brain injury: review of data dictionaries and consultation.Pediatr Res. 2025 Jun;97(7):2491. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-03949-7. Pediatr Res. 2025. PMID: 39994337 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Update on the harmonisation of disability data collection in UK surveys (part 1).Health Stat Q. 2011 Autumn;(51):3-30. doi: 10.1057/hsq.2011.12. Health Stat Q. 2011. PMID: 21894156
-
The experiences and needs of healthcare professionals facing perinatal death: A scoping review.Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Mar;68:25-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 28. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017. PMID: 28063339
-
Conceptual framework on barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care and treatment for women: the MATRIx evidence synthesis.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(2):1-187. doi: 10.3310/KQFE0107. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 38317290
References
-
- Ockenden, D. Findings, conclusions and essential actions from the independent review of maternity services at The Shrewsbuty and Telford Hospital NHS Trust (APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2022).
-
- NHS Resolution. Five years of Cerebral Palsy claims. A thematic review of NHS Resolution data (NHS Resolution, 2017).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources