Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):52.
doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03770-6.

Discriminatory power of trabeculectomy bleb internal reflectivity and morphology in surgical success using anterior segment optical coherence tomography

Affiliations

Discriminatory power of trabeculectomy bleb internal reflectivity and morphology in surgical success using anterior segment optical coherence tomography

Jeremy C K Tan et al. BMC Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: The post-operative evaluation of trabeculectomy blebs has traditionally relied on subjective clinical grading systems performed at the slit-lamp. This study explores the use of swept source anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to objectively measure bleb internal reflectivity and morphology, and to distinguish blebs with surgical success vs. failure.

Methods: Cross-sectional study of patients with glaucoma who had undergone trabeculectomy at least one year prior. Swept source AS-OCT was used to capture filtering blebs in the sagittal plane. Standardised regions of interests on the sagittal plane were segmented, and pixel intensity values and bleb height were measured. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to examine the discriminatory ability of pixel intensity values and bleb morphology to classify blebs with surgical success or failure.

Results: 100 eyes of 65 patients were included, with a median post-operative follow up of 7.0 years (IQR 3.2-16 years). The proportion of complete success, qualified success and failure was 45%, 33%, and 22% respectively. The maximum bleb height was significantly greater in the blebs with complete success (1.74 vs. 1.25 vs. 1.23 mm in CS vs. QS vs. F, one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001). Mean pixel intensity was significantly lower in blebs with complete success (150.8 vs. 157.4 vs. 167.4 in CS vs. QS vs. F, p = 0.0001). Bleb intensity standard deviation (AUC 0.81), maximal bleb height (AUC 0.76), mean pixel intensity (AUC 0.75) and minimum pixel intensity (AUC 0.75) offered the best discrimination between surgical success and failure.

Conclusions: Swept-source AS-OCT can be used to quantify bleb internal reflectivity and morphology, which can be used to distinguish between well vs. poorly functioning blebs. These parameters may assist surgeons in the objective evaluation of post-operative bleb outcomes.

Keywords: Glaucoma surgery; Mitomycin-C; Scleral flap; Sclerostomy; Surgical success; Surgical technique; Trabeculectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Royal Liverpool University Hospital Trust clinical governance department (reference number: 11783). Due to the retrospective nature of this study using deidentified data, waiver of consent was granted by the Royal Liverpool University Hospital Trust clinical governance department; informed consent was not required from participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Meeting presentation: Presented at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual meeting 2023, New Orleans, Louisiana. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Enface (A and D) and sagittal AS-OCT images of a well-functioning trabeculectomy bleb with the overlying raster block shown in A and D, anatomical landmarks labelled in B and E, and surgical parameters of interest in C and F. The yellow line in panel A represents the sagittal slice overlying the sclerostomy and peripheral iridotomy, while the yellow lines in panel D represent the sagittal slice overlying the sclerostomy and mid-point of the scleral flap. Abbreviations: Anterior chamber (AC), Peripheral iridotomy (PI)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standardised region of interest (ROI) measuring 400 by 800 pixels on the sagittal AS-OCT slice overlying the peripheral iridotomy and bisecting the scleral flap. This ROI is used for subsequent automated quantification of pixel intensity values
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Box and Whisker plots (median, interquartile range and 5th to 95th percentile) and results of one-way ANOVA of bleb intensity values (mean, minimum, maximum, standard deviation and solidity of pixel intensity) and sagittal bleb area across the outcome groups of complete success (CS), qualified success (QS) and failure (F). Ns = non-significant. Asterisks denote statistical significance [ie. p < 0.05 (*), < 0.01 (**), < 0.001 (***), < 0.0001 (****)]
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Receiver operating characteristic curves of standard deviation (SD) of pixel values, mean intensity, minimum intensity and bleb height to classify blebs with surgical success vs. failure
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Box and Whisker plots (median, interquartile range and 5th to 95th percentile) and results of one-way ANOVA of scleral flap dimensions, sclerostomy dimensions and distance of the sclerostomy from the iridocorneal angle across the outcome groups of complete success (CS), qualified success (QS) and failure (F). Ns = non-significant. Asterisks denote statistical significance [ie. p < 0.05 (*), < 0.01 (**), < 0.001 (***), < 0.0001 (****)]
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Representative blebs classified as complete success (A), qualified success (B) and failure (C) with associated global mean pixel intensity values, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medications and maximal bleb height shown. Note the eye with bleb C underwent secondary tube shunt surgery, therefore bleb C was defined as having failed

References

    1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–90. - PubMed
    1. Jayaram H. Intraocular pressure reduction in glaucoma: does every mmHg count? Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2020;10(4):255–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khaw PT, Chiang M, Shah P, Sii F, Lockwood A, Khalili A. Enhanced trabeculectomy: the Moorfields Safer surgery system. Dev Ophthalmol. 2017;59:15–35. - PubMed
    1. Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Lim KS, Barton K, Goyal S, Ahmed II, et al. Treatment outcomes in the primary tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 5 years of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(12):1344–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(5):789–e8032. - PMC - PubMed