Uropygial gland microbiota of nearctic-neotropical migrants vary with season and migration distance
- PMID: 39885562
- PMCID: PMC11780944
- DOI: 10.1186/s42523-024-00367-8
Uropygial gland microbiota of nearctic-neotropical migrants vary with season and migration distance
Abstract
Symbiotic microbiota are important drivers of host behaviour, health, and fitness. While most studies focus on humans, model organisms, and domestic or economically important species, research investigating the role of host microbiota in wild populations is rapidly accumulating. Most studies focus on the gut microbiota; however, skin and other glandular microbiota also play an important role in shaping traits that may impact host fitness. The uropygial gland is an important source of chemical cues and harbours diverse microbes that could mediate chemical communication in birds, so determining the factors most important in shaping host microbiota should improve our understanding of microbially-mediated chemical communication. Hypothesizing that temporal, geographic, and taxonomic effects influence host microbiota, we evaluated the effects of season, migration distance, and taxonomy on the uropygial gland microbiota of 18 passerine species from 11 families. By sampling 473 birds at a single stopover location during spring and fall migration and using 16S rRNA sequencing, we demonstrate that season, followed by migration distance, had the strongest influence on uropygial gland microbial community composition. While statistically significant, taxonomic family and species had only weak effects on gland microbiota. Given that temporal effects on gland microbiota were nearly ubiquitous among the species we tested, determining the consequences of and mechanisms driving this seasonal variation are important next steps.
Keywords: Microbiome; Migration; Passerine; Preen gland; Seasonal variation; Uropygial gland.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: We followed applicable national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals in research. All birds were handled under permission from Environment and Climate Change Canada (banding permit 10,169 CK). All procedures were approved by McMaster University (Animal Use Protocol 18-05-20). Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Preen gland microbiota of songbirds differ across populations but not sexes.J Anim Ecol. 2021 Sep;90(9):2202-2212. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13531. Epub 2021 Jun 22. J Anim Ecol. 2021. PMID: 34002375
-
Preen gland microbiota covary with major histocompatibility complex genotype in a songbird.R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Oct 6;8(10):210936. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210936. eCollection 2021 Oct. R Soc Open Sci. 2021. PMID: 34754501 Free PMC article.
-
Uropygial gland microbiota differ between free-living and captive songbirds.Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 31;12(1):18283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22425-4. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36316352 Free PMC article.
-
Olfactory Communication via Microbiota: What Is Known in Birds?Genes (Basel). 2018 Jul 31;9(8):387. doi: 10.3390/genes9080387. Genes (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30065222 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Female-Based Patterns and Social Function in Avian Chemical Communication.J Chem Ecol. 2021 Jan;47(1):43-62. doi: 10.1007/s10886-020-01230-1. Epub 2020 Oct 26. J Chem Ecol. 2021. PMID: 33103230 Review.
References
-
- Parfrey LW, Moreau CS, Russell JA. The host-associated microbiome: pattern, process and function. Mol Ecol. 2018;27:1749–65. - PubMed
-
- Ezenwa VO, Gerardo NM, Inouye DW, Medina M, Xavier JB. Animal behavior and the microbiome. Science. 2012;338:198–9. - PubMed
-
- Sherwin E, Bordenstein SR, Quinn JL, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Microbiota and the social brain. Science. 2019;366:1–15. - PubMed
-
- Sandrini S, Aldriwesh M, Alruways M, Freestone P. Microbial endocrinology: host–bacteria communication within the gut microbiome. J Endocrinol. 2015;225:R21-34. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources