Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 24:33:100691.
doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100691. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Linear approximation of variable relative biological effectiveness models for proton therapy

Affiliations

Linear approximation of variable relative biological effectiveness models for proton therapy

Dirk Wagenaar et al. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

The McNamara (MCN) and Wedenberg (WED) RBE weighted dose (DRBE), dose and dose-weighted average LET (LETd) were calculated in twenty brain cancer patients. A linear approximation was made for each RBE model to give best agreement to clinically relevant dosimetric parameters. Additional evaluations were done on twenty head and neck and twenty breast cancer patients.The R2 of the fits was ≥0.94 and ≥0.91 for MCN and WED respectively for α/β values ≥1.0 Gy. The graphs derived in this work can be used to convert RBE-LET slopes derived from clinical data to α/β values in the MCN or WED models.

Keywords: Linear Energy Transfer (LET); Proton therapy; Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Slope of the RBE-LETd relation and coefficient of determination (R2) as a function of α/β. R2 calculated using the difference with physical dose (i.e. DRBE – Dphys).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Calibration curves of the McNamara, Wedenberg and linear models. Each datapoint represents a dosimetric parameter tied to a clinical goal. An α/β of 2.0 Gy was used. The figures illustrate the disagreement between McNamara and a linear fit (left), Wedenberg and a linear fit (middle) and between McNamara and Wedenberg. For perfect agreement between models all points are expected to lie on the dotted line. The linear fits were made based on parameters of brain patients (blue), but also head and neck (red) and breast (orange) patients are shown. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Similar articles

References

    1. ICRU. Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Proton-Beam. ICRU Report 78. 2007; 7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndi004.
    1. Paganetti H., Niemierko A., Ancukiewicz M., Gerweck L.E., Goitein M., Loeffler J.S., et al. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2002;53:407–421. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02754-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paganetti H. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:R419–R472. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/22/R419. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rørvik E., Fjæra L.F., Dahle T.J., Dale J.E., Engeseth G.M., Stokkevåg C.H., et al. Exploration and application of phenomenological RBE models for proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63 doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad9db. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wedenberg M., Lind B.K., Hårdemark B. A model for the relative biological effectiveness of protons: the tissue specific parameter α/β of photons is a predictor for the sensitivity to LET changes. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:580–588. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.705892. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources