Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Cardiology Physicians and Fellows in Training
- PMID: 39886307
- PMCID: PMC11780134
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101545
Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Cardiology Physicians and Fellows in Training
Abstract
Background: The number of practicing lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) cardiologists is unknown despite diversity initiatives focused on understanding workforce demographics.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, sources of mistreatment, and measures of wellness among the LGBTQ+ cardiology community.
Methods: An online survey was sent to the American College of Cardiology Fellow in Training and Early Career Professional Listservs and shared on social media sites. The survey included the Short-Negative Acts Questionnaire and LGBTQ+ -specific harassment questions. Chi-square analysis and Fisher exact tests were performed to compare responses between LGBTQ+ and non-LGBTQ+ respondents.
Results: A total of 188 respondents completed the survey (56% Fellow in Training). One-third (33%) identified as LGBTQ+. Gender identity data included: transgender (3%), nonbinary (2%), gender queer (1%), and agender (1%). LGBTQ+ physicians were less likely to agree with the statements 'LGBTQ+ patients were treated fairly' (40% vs 66%, P < 0.001), and 'leadership dealt with people demonstrating poor behavior fairly' (34% vs 51%, P = 0.029) compared to heterosexual peers. LGBTQ+ physicians were more likely to report gender policing and heterosexist harassment compared to heterosexual peers (P = 0.002). The majority of physicians (91%) were satisfied with their decision to become a cardiologist.
Conclusions: This current analysis of LGBTQ+ cardiologists in the workplace identifies opportunities to address mistreatment impacting the LGBTQ+ community. Despite experiencing mistreatment, LGBTQ+ cardiologists report high job satisfaction. Further work is necessary to create a safe space and diverse cohort of physicians required to meet the needs of LGBTQ+ patients at risk for cardiovascular disease.
Keywords: LGBTQ+; cardiovascular medicine; diversity; minority physicians; mistreatment.
© 2025 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Gallup LGBTQ+ identification in US now at 7.6% https://news.gallup.com/poll/611864/lgbtq-identification.aspx
-
- James S., Herman J., Rankin S., Keisling M., Mottet L., Anafi M. 2016. The report of the 2015 US transgender study. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality.
-
- Inman E.M., Obedin-Maliver J., Ragosta S., et al. Reports of negative interactions with healthcare providers among transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people assigned female at birth in the United States: results from an online, cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;31:6007. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20116007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
