Oncological outcomes and complications following radical cystectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy - A retrospective comparative cohort study from a single-center in South India
- PMID: 39886639
- PMCID: PMC11778687
- DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_214_24
Oncological outcomes and complications following radical cystectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy - A retrospective comparative cohort study from a single-center in South India
Abstract
Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the management of muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma has not been adopted universally. We studied the oncological outcomes and complications in patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) with or without NAC.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent RC with or without NAC from June 2009 to June 2020 was conducted. Oncological outcomes, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), complications, and prognostic factors were analyzed.
Results: Of the 314 patients who underwent RC, 83 patients received NAC (Group A), and 231 underwent RC alone (Group B). The median age was 58 years. The median follow-up duration was 22 (3-64) and 24 (3-62) months, respectively. The median OS in Group A was significantly higher than Group B (38 months [confidence interval (CI): 34-42] and 32 [CI: 29-35], respectively, [P = 0.033]). The RFS in Groups A and B was 34 (CI: 30-39) and 31 (CI: 28-34) months, respectively (P = 0.47). Higher pathological T stage (T3/4), node positivity and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were predictors of poor OS and RFS (P < 0.0001). Clavien grades 3/4 complications were comparable (8% vs. 15%; P = 0.19). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was associated with higher postoperative complications in both groups (P = 0.012).
Conclusion: The OS with NAC was superior to upfront RC. RFS was, however, comparable. NAC was safe and well-tolerated. Pathologically, higher T stage, node positivity, and LVI were associated with poorer OS and RFS. Low GFR negatively influenced postoperative complications.
Copyright: © 2025 Indian Journal of Urology.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: Long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:666–75. - PubMed
-
- Wettstein MS, Rooprai JK, Pazhepurackel C, Wallis CJ, Klaassen Z, Uleryk EM, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on trimodal therapy versus radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Does the current quality of evidence justify definitive conclusions? PLoS One. 2019;14:e0216255. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Fahmy O, Khairul-Asri MG, Schubert T, Renninger M, Malek R, Kübler H, et al. Asystematic review and meta-analysis on the oncological long-term outcomes after trimodality therapy and radical cystectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2018;36:43–53. - PubMed
-
- Liu W, Tian J, Zhang S, Yang E, Shen H, Li F, et al. The utilization status of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021;73:144–53. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources