Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;240(1):e31527.
doi: 10.1002/jcp.31527.

RETRACTION: Promotion of Cell Autophagy and Apoptosis in Cervical Cancer by Inhibition of Long Noncoding RNA LINC00511 via Transcription Factor RXRA-regulated PLD1

No authors listed

RETRACTION: Promotion of Cell Autophagy and Apoptosis in Cervical Cancer by Inhibition of Long Noncoding RNA LINC00511 via Transcription Factor RXRA-regulated PLD1

No authors listed. J Cell Physiol. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Y. Shi, M. Liu, Y. Huang, J. Zhang, and L. Yin, "Promotion of Cell Autophagy and Apoptosis in Cervical Cancer by Inhibition of Long Noncoding RNA LINC00511 via Transcription Factor RXRA-regulated PLD1," Journal of Cellular Physiology 235, no. 10 (2020): 6592-6604. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.29529. The above article, published online on 17 February 2020 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), and has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Robert Heath; and Wiley Periodicals LLC. A third party reported that images shared overlapping sections in Figure 5D in this article, and this duplication was confirmed by the publisher. The third party also reported that the tumor measurement ruler used in Figure 5 A is identical to the ruler used in the figures of previously published articles from different authors, each of which describes a different scientific context (Chen, et al. 2019 [https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28911]) and (Feng, et al. 2019 [https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02841-z]). The use of the identical ruler in the figures of different articles from unrelated research groups at different institutions puts in doubt the veracity of the data reported. The authors did not respond to an inquiry by the publisher. The retraction has been agreed on because the evidence of image duplication within this article, as well as unexplained duplication of image elements and equipment with other experiments by different authors, fundamentally compromises the conclusions reported in this article. The authors did not respond to our notice regarding the retraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Retraction of

Publication types