Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;34(6):2336-2347.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.17660. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Enteral Feeding Intolerance in Critical Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Enteral Feeding Intolerance in Critical Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Lijie Liu et al. J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: To construct and validate a prediction model for enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients during the first 7 days of enteral feeding.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Methods: We reviewed the medical records of two intensive care units from January 2015 to August 2023, to develop a prediction model by univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis. Model's performance was evaluated through discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis.

Results: This study involved a total of 471 patients, with an enteral feeding intolerance incidence rate of 35.7%. The prediction model comprised six variables, namely neurological disease, chronic gastrointestinal disease, Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Assessment II score, sedatives, acid suppressants and serum albumin. The model showed robust discrimination, calibration and clinical net benefit, indicating significant potential for practical application with readily available variables.

Conclusions: The model demonstrated strong predictive performance in assessing the risk of enteral feeding intolerance during the early stage of nutrition initiation.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Enhancing clinicians' capacity to reduce the incidence of enteral feeding intolerance and improve patient outcomes.

Impact: The prediction model shows a good capacity to discriminate critically ill patients at risk of enteral feeding intolerance, is helpful to provide personalised care.

Reporting method: TRIPOD + AI checklist.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ChiCTR2400090757.

Keywords: critical care; enteral feeding intolerance; prediction model; proactive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alsaber, A., A. Al‐Herz, J. Pan, A. T. Al‐Sultan, D. Mishra, and K. Group. 2021. “Handling Missing Data in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry Using Random Forest Approach.” International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 24: 1282–1293. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756‐185X.14203.
    1. Blaser, A. R., A. M. Deane, J.‐C. Preiser, Y. M. Arabi, and S. M. Jakob. 2021. “Enteral Feeding Intolerance: Updates in Definitions and Pathophysiology.” Nutrition in Clinical Practice 36: 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10599.
    1. Bordejé, M., J. Montejo, M. Mateu, et al. 2019. “Intra‐Abdominal Pressure as a Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients. The PIANE Study.” Nutrients 11: 2616. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112616.
    1. C. G. C. Association. 2022. “Clinical Practice Guideline for Appropriate Use of Gastric Acid Suppressants in Gastrointestinal Surgery.” Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 25, no. 2022: 933–946. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530‐20221024‐00429.
    1. Cadena, A. J., S. Habib, F. Rincon, and S. Dobak. 2019. “The Benefits of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Versus Enteral Nutrition (EN) Among Adult Critically Ill Patients: What Is the Evidence? A Literature Review.” Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 35: 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066619843782.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources