Comparison of the incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence by hysterectomy route and type based on experienced surgeons' outcome
- PMID: 39891484
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.16189
Comparison of the incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence by hysterectomy route and type based on experienced surgeons' outcome
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the rate of vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) by surgical approach and surgeons' experience.
Method: In this observational, retrospective, cohort study, rates of VCD were calculated based on surgical approach, and VCD clinical characteristics were analyzed. Surgical routes of laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotic surgery were compared. All minimally invasive surgeries were performed or supervised by a Japanese Society of Gynecology Obstetrics Endoscopy-certified laparoscopic surgeon.
Results: There were 4864 hysterectomies in total: abdominal hysterectomies (n = 2578, 53.0%), laparoscopic hysterectomies (n = 1840, 37.8%), and robotic hysterectomies (n = 446, 9.2%). Among the 20 (0.411%) patients with VCD, the rate of VCD was highest for laparoscopic hysterectomy (0.706%), followed by robotic surgery (0.224%) and laparotomy (0.233%). Most causes of VCD were due to intercourse (50%), but 8 of 9 (88.8%) cases caused spontaneously or by defecation were laparoscopic cases. Defecation-related and spontaneous cases occurred significantly earlier after surgery than did intercourse-related cases (P = 0.008).
Conclusion: Our data showed a decrease in laparoscopic VCD compared with those of previous reports. VCD occurred more frequently with laparoscopy than with laparotomy, even when performed by experienced surgeons. Laparoscopic VCD often develops early with little external force applied. Problems with vaginal stump rigidity may be related to the surgical procedure.
Keywords: complication; laparoscopic surgery; robotic surgery; vaginal cuff dehiscence.
© 2025 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Nezhat C, Kennedy Burns M, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence and evisceration: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(4):972‐985.
-
- Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989;5(2):213‐216.
-
- Jan H, Nobbenhuis M, Ind T. Comparison of knot tying in robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery: robotic knots as tight as, but more secure than, open knots. J Gynecol Surg. 2013;29(6):287‐291.
-
- Uccella S, Ceccaroni M, Cromi A, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12,398 hysterectomies: effect of different types of colpotomy and vaginal closure. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(3):516‐523.
-
- Hur HC, Guido RS, Mansuria SM, Hacker MR, Sanfilippo JS, Lee TT. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(3):311‐317.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
