Utility Values of Health Status in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 39892180
- PMCID: PMC12225718
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101063
Utility Values of Health Status in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) imposes a significant burden of disease globally. Multiple treatments are available but are associated with high costs and potentially detrimental effects on quality of life. The utility values of health status are measures of patient preference over quality of life, which are increasingly used for health and economic decision-making. Currently, there is little systematized information on the utility values for different stages of GC. This systematic review synthesizes and meta-analyses the literature on GC utilities.
Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library for studies reporting utility values calculated using direct and indirect methods. Information from the selected studies was extracted and appraised, and meta-analyses of utility values based on GC health states were performed.
Results: Twelve studies involving 4585 patients were included. Random-effects meta-analysis estimates showed a mean utility of 0.77 (95% CI 0.7-0.85) for stage I, 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.85) for stage II, 0.70 (95% CI 0.63-0.96) for stage III, and 0.64 (95% CI 0.56-0.32) for stage IV. All estimates showed considerable heterogeneity.
Conclusions: Our study provides an updated overview of the literature on utility values in GC and presents a discussion of the relevance of GC stages for its analysis. Decision-makers should consider patients' preferences in the proposal of policies and clinical decisions.
Keywords: EQ-5D; economic evaluation; gastric cancer; health-state utility values.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section.
Similar articles
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
-
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17999840
-
Systematic review of the impact of urinary tract infections on health-related quality of life.BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E830-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11337.x. Epub 2012 Jul 20. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22816657
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Patients' Preferences for Gastric Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study on Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategies.J Gastric Cancer. 2025 Jul;25(3):478-496. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e35. J Gastric Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40631476 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, TLA JA, Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. - PubMed
-
- Fuchs H, Holscher AH, Leers J, et al. Long-term quality of life after surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: extended gastrectomy or transthoracic esophagectomy? Gastric Cancer. 2016;19(1):312–317. - PubMed
-
- Dickson JL, Cunningham D. Systemic treatment of gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16(3):255–263. - PubMed
-
- Papaioannou D, Brazier J, Paisley S. NICE DSU technical support document 9: the identification, review and synthesis of health state utility values from the literature. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425822/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK425822.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2022. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous