Annual versus less frequent mammographic surveillance in people with breast cancer aged 50 years and older in the UK (Mammo-50): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial
- PMID: 39892911
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02715-6
Annual versus less frequent mammographic surveillance in people with breast cancer aged 50 years and older in the UK (Mammo-50): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial
Abstract
Background: The frequency of mammographic surveillance for women after diagnosis of breast cancer varies globally. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether less than annual mammography was non-inferior in terms of breast cancer-specific survival in women aged 50 years or older.
Methods: Mammo-50 was a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial of annual versus less frequent mammography (2-yearly after conservation surgery; 3-yearly after a mastectomy) for women aged 50 years or older at initial diagnosis of invasive or non-invasive breast cancer and who were recurrence free 3 years post curative surgery. The trial was conducted at 114 National Health Service hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to annual or less frequent mammograms at 3 years post curative surgery and were followed up for 6 years. The co-primary outcomes were breast cancer-specific survival and cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported elsewhere. Breast cancer-specific survival was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free interval, overall survival, and referrals back to the hospital system. 5000 women provided 90% power to detect a 3% absolute non-inferiority margin for breast cancer-specific survival with 2·5% one-sided significance. The trial was registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN48534559; recruitment is complete but longer-term follow-up is ongoing.
Findings: Between April 22, 2014, and Sept 28, 2018, 5235 women were randomly assigned to annual mammography (n=2618) or less frequent mammography (n=2617). 3858 (73·6%) women were aged 60 years or older, 4202 (80·3%) had undergone conservation surgery, 4576 (87·4%) had invasive disease, 1159 (22·1%) had node positive disease, and 4330 (82·7%) had oestrogen receptor-positive tumours. With a median of 5·7 years follow-up (IQR 5·0-6·0; 8·7 years post curative surgery), 343 women died, including 116 who died of breast cancer (61 in the annual mammography group and 55 in the less frequent mammography group). 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was 98·1% (95% CI 97·5-98·6) in the annual mammography group and 98·3% (97·8-98·8) in the less frequent mammography group (hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·64-1·32), demonstrating non-inferiority of less frequent mammography at the pre-specified 3% margin (non-inferiority p<0·0001). 5-year recurrence-free interval was 94·1% (95% CI 93·1-94·9) in the annual mammography group and 94·5% (93·5-95·3) in the less frequent mammography group. Overall survival at 5 years was 94·7% (95% CI 93·8-95·5%) and 94·5% (93·5-95·3), respectively. 224 (64·9%) of 345 breast cancer events were detected from emergency admissions or symptomatic referrals back to the hospital system, including 108 (61·7%) of 175 in the annual mammography group and 116 (68·2%) of 170 in the less frequent mammography group.
Interpretation: For patients aged 50 years or older and at 3 years post diagnosis, less frequent mammograms were non-inferior compared with annual mammograms for breast cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free interval, and overall survival, and should be considered for this population.
Funding: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests JAD received funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator Award (NIHR200274) and the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) grant (project reference 11/25/03) through the University of Warwick, which funded JAD, AM, NE, AH, AY, HH, SG, and BS at the University of Warwick; CH, BS, and PSH at the University of Leeds; PD and AE as clinical chief investigators; and EKW at Oxford Brookes University. LT is a member of Independent Cancer Patients’ Voice, which was included in patient and public involvement activities. DAC received funding from AstraZeneca UK, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo UK, SeaGen UK, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Owkin France, Axio Research, Aventis Pharma, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, SeaGen International, Novartis, Novartis Pharma, Aventis Pharma, Sanofi Genzyme USA–Genzyme Corporation, Grail Bio UK, Next Gen Healthcare Communications, Gilead Sciences, AstraZeneca Singapore, Exact Sciences International, Erytech Pharma, and Make Seconds Count. PSH received funding from NIHR, Lilly, Eisai, Novartis, Merck, Gilead, Sanofi, Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, AbbVie and SeaGen. SEP received funding from NIHR, Wellcome Leap, Butterfield Trust, Exact Sciences, Daiichi-Sankyo, Roche, and AstraZeneca. She is Chair of the UK National Coordinating Committee for Breast Pathology and President of the Association of Breast Pathology. All other authors declare no other competing interests.
Comment in
-
Rethinking surveillance after breast cancer.Lancet. 2025 Feb 1;405(10476):356-358. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00093-5. Lancet. 2025. PMID: 39892894 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous