Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;54(2):e70017.
doi: 10.1111/ahe.70017.

Differential Expression/Regulation of Progesterone Receptor in Reproductive Tissues (Ovary and Uterus) Induced by Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin Treatments in Sows

Oswaldo Cruz León  1 , Santiago René Anzaldúa Arce  1 , Miguel Angel Cornejo Cortes  2 , Marco Cerbón  3 , Francisco Ernesto Martínez Castañeda  4 , Raúl Ulloa Arvizu  5 , María Elena Trujillo Ortega  6
Affiliations

Differential Expression/Regulation of Progesterone Receptor in Reproductive Tissues (Ovary and Uterus) Induced by Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and Equine Chorionic Gonadotropin Treatments in Sows

Oswaldo Cruz León et al. Anat Histol Embryol. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

We studied sows (Landrace × Yorkshire line, DanBred Hybrid) to evaluate the possible changes in progesterone receptor (PR) expression in the uterus and ovary caused by different non-hypophyseal gonadotropins treatments: equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Varying concentrations of eCG and hCG were evaluated (Groups 1, 2, 3, 4). PR expression was determined by immunohistochemistry, and labelling intensity was determined by the HScore method. In the ovary, PR expression in the granulosa cells of follicles did not differ significantly between Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05) but differed significantly from that in Groups 3 and 4 (p < 0.05), which in turn did not differ from each other. This PR expression pattern was similar across groups in the internal and external theca cells. Conversely, in the uterus, PR expression in the lining epithelium was lower in Group 4 than that in Group 1 (p < 0.05). Increased expression was observed in the endometrial lamina propria in all groups 2 and 4 compared to that in the control group (p < 0.05). Decreased expression was observed in the glandular epithelium and myometrium in Group 4 compared to that in Group 1 (p < 0.05). In the ovary, PR expression in the granulosa and outer and inner theca of the follicles was not significantly different (p < 0.05) between Groups 1 and 2 or Groups 3 and 4; however, the expression in these pairs of groups differed from each other. Thus, changes in PR expression may depend on the concentrations and proportions of exogenous hormones used in the treatments, indicating an alteration in the reproductive process.

Keywords: hormones; ovary; progesterone; reproduction; sows; uterus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Representation of the days on which non‐hypophyseal gonadotropins were applied in different concentrations, taking Day 17 of the estrous cycle as the start of treatment.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
HScore of progesterone receptor (PR) in the lining epithelium (A) and lamina propria (B). Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
HScore of progesterone receptor (PR) in the glandular epithelium (C) and myometrium (D). Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Expression of progesterone receptors in various structures of the uterus, such as the lining epithelium (blue arrows), lamina propria (Black arrows) and myometrium (white arrows) of Group 1 (A, C), Group 2 (a, c), Group 3 (B, D) and Group 4 (b, d).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Expression of progesterone receptors in various ovarian structures, such as granulosa cells (black arrows), external theca (green circle) and internal theca (blue star) of Group 1 (A), Group 2 (B), Group 3 (C) and Group 4 (D).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
HScore of progesterone receptor in granulosa cells (A) and inner theca (B) of follicles. Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
HScore of the progesterone receptor in the outer theca cells of the follicles (A). Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Breen, S. M. , Rodriguez‐Zas S. L., and Knox R. V.. 2006. “Effect of Altering Dose of PG600 on Reproductive Performance Responses in Prepubertal Gilts and Weaned Sows.” Animal Reproduction Science 95, no. 3–4: 316–323. 10.1016/J.ANIREPROSCI.2005.12.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cuello, C. , Berthelot F., Martinat‐Botté F., et al. 2004. “Transfer of Vitrified Blastocysts From One or Two Superovulated Large White Hyperprolific Donors to Meishan Recipients: Reproductive Parameters at Day 30 of Pregnancy.” Theriogenology 61, no. 5: 843–850. 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00257-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Esbenshade, K. L. , Ziecikt A. J., and Britt J. H.. 1990. “Regulation and Action of Gonadotrophinsin Pigs.” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 40: 19–32. - PubMed
    1. Fields, M. J. , and Shemesh M.. 2004. “Extragonadal Luteinizing Hormone Receptors in the Reproductive Tract of Domestic Animals.” Biology of Reproduction 71: 1412–1418. 10.1095/biolreprod.104.027201. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guthrie, H. D. , Pursel V. G., and Wall R. J.. 1997. “Porcine Follicle‐Stimulating Hormone Treatment of Gilts During an Altrenogest‐Synchronized Follicular Phase: Effects on Follicle Growth, Hormone Secretion, Ovulation, and Fertilization.” Journal of Animal Science 75, no. 12: 3246–3254. 10.2527/1997.75123246X. - DOI - PubMed