Beyond ethical guidelines: upholding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance in health and medical research. A scoping review
- PMID: 39893586
- DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52564
Beyond ethical guidelines: upholding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance in health and medical research. A scoping review
Abstract
Objectives: To examine what ethics approvals are being sought for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and medical research, and to determine what proportion of this research upholds Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance via an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community-controlled human research ethics committee (AHREC) by jurisdiction and funding body type.
Study design: Scoping review of all original, peer-reviewed health and medical literature published over a 5-year period (January 2018 to December 2022).
Data sources: Extending on a previous review, the search tool LIt.search was used to access all literature relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and medical research.
Results: 589 eligible publications were included from the parent review, and a further 1703 publications were identified from the updated search. A total of 945 publications were included. A substantial number of ethics approvals were obtained from government-based ethics committees (394, 41.7%). More than half of the publications reported obtaining institutional ethics approval (514, 54.4%). Less than half (400, 42.3%) reported obtaining AHREC approval. Almost one-third of publications were on research that was conducted in states or territories where there is no AHREC (334, 35.3%). Publications did not always report obtaining AHREC approvals, including in jurisdictions where one operates.
Conclusions: We found a concerning lack of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance reported in health and medical research. Acknowledging that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethics guidelines and AHRECs were established due to harm caused to communities, these results suggest a high risk, with research not consistently being deemed safe, respectful and beneficial with appropriate AHREC ethics review and approval. We join calls for the establishment of AHRECs in all jurisdictions and nationally. Furthermore, we urge funding bodies and institutions to uphold requirements for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance in research and funding agreements, as well as institutional policies and procedures.
Keywords: Ethics; research.
© 2025 AMPCo Pty Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Reported processes and practices of researchers applying for human research ethics approval for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research: a mixed methods study.Med J Aust. 2025 Feb 3;222 Suppl 2:S25-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52565. Med J Aust. 2025. PMID: 39893580
-
Human research ethics committee processes and practices for approving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research: a mixed methods study.Med J Aust. 2025 Feb 3;222 Suppl 2:S34-S41. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52563. Med J Aust. 2025. PMID: 39893582
-
How well are researchers applying ethical principles and practices in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and medical research? A cross-sectional study.Med J Aust. 2025 Feb 3;222 Suppl 2:S49-S56. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52572. Med J Aust. 2025. PMID: 39893589
-
Decolonising qualitative research with respectful, reciprocal, and responsible research practice: a narrative review of the application of Yarning method in qualitative Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research.Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 13;21(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01738-w. Int J Equity Health. 2022. PMID: 36100899 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Achieving cultural safety for Australia's First Peoples: a review of the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency-registered health practitioners' Codes of Conduct and Codes of Ethics.Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):398-406. doi: 10.1071/AH20215. Aust Health Rev. 2021. PMID: 33844959 Review.
References
-
- Australian Government Productivity Commission. Review of the National Agreement on Closing the Gap: study report. Canberra: Productivity Commission, 2024. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/closing‐the‐gap‐review/report/... (viewed Apr 2024).
-
- Thomas DP, Bainbridge R, Tsey K. Changing discourses in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research, 1914–2014. Med J Aust 2014; 201: S15‐S18. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2014/201/1/changing‐discourses‐aboriginal...
-
- Bainbridge R, Tsey K, McCalman J, et al. No one's discussing the elephant in the room: contemplating questions of research impact and benefit in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian health research. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 696.
-
- Tuhiwai Smith L. Decolonizing methodologies: research and Indigenous peoples. 3rd ed. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2022.
-
- Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Closing the Gap on Indigenous disadvantage: the challenge for Australia. Canberra: Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, 2009. https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/05_2012/closing_the... (viewed Apr 2024).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources