Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 2;25(1):180.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05279-2.

Disulfidptosis-related immune patterns predict prognosis and characterize the tumor microenvironment in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations

Disulfidptosis-related immune patterns predict prognosis and characterize the tumor microenvironment in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Xuechen Wu et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Establishing a prognostic risk model based on immunological and disulfidptosis signatures enables precise prognosis prediction of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Methods: Differentially expressed immune and disulfidptosis genes were identified in OSCC and normal tissues. We examined the model's clinical applicability and its relationship to immune cell infiltration. Additionally, the risk score, ssGSEA, ESTIMATE, and CIBERSORT were used to evaluate the intrinsic molecular subtypes, immunological checkpoints, abundances of tumor-infiltrating immune cell types and proportions between the two risk groups. GO-KEGG and GSVA analyses were performed to identify enriched pathways.

Results: We analyzed the correlation immune genes based on the 14 disulfidptosis-related genes, and found 379 disulfidptosis-related immune genes (DRIGs). After univariate Cox regression we obtained 30 DRIGs and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to reduce the number of genes to 16. Finally we created a nine-DRIGs risk model, of which four were upregulated and five were downregulated. The analysis results showed that disulfidptosis was tightly related to immune cells, immunological-related pathways, the tumor microenvironment (TME), immune checkpoints, human leukocyte antigen (HLA), and tumor mutational burden (TMB). The nomogram, integrating the risk score and clinical factors, accurately predicted overall survival.

Conclusions: This novel risk model highlights the role of disulfidptosis-related immune genes in OSCC prognosis. With this model, we can more accurately predict the prognosis of patients with OSCC, as well as assess the potential effects of their TME and immunotherapy.

Keywords: Disulfidptosis; Immune gene; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Prognosis; Risk model; TCGA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. No.2022095 K was approved by Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University Medical Ethics Committee. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Identification of disulfidptosis-related genes in OSCC. A Comparison of disulfidptosis-related genes between normal and tumor tissues. B The connection among disulfidptosis-related genes. C The mutational status of disulfidptosis-related gene and the TMB of samples. D The interaction of disulfidptosis-related genes and immune genes
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Disulfidptosis-related genes relative RNA expression level in HIOEC, HN30, SCC9, CAL27 cell lines
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
DRIGs from the TCGA OSCC cohort were used to build the prognostic model. A Univariate Cox analysis of 30 selected DRIGs B, C LASSO coefficient profiles in the tenfold cross validation. D Multivariate Cox analysis of the nine DRIGs
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Construction of the prognostic model in the training set. A The risk score distributions, B survival times, C overall survival of OSCCs, D time-dependent ROC curve in the OSCC GEO cohort
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of different subgroups. Patients with male (A), female (B), age ≤ 65 (C), age > 65 (D), G1-G2 (E), G3-G4 (F), stage I-II (G), stage III-IV (H), stage T1-T2 (I), stage T3-T4 (J), N0 (K), and N1-N3 (L)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
DRIGs for nomogram construction. A Nomogram that combined the risk score and clinical data to facilitate prognosis prediction. B The ROC curves demonstrated the nomogram’s predictive effectiveness. C The calibration curve demonstrated the agreement between the actual observed prognostic value and the value projected by the nomogram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(4–5):309–16. - PubMed
    1. Miranda-Filho A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in cancers of the lip, tongue and mouth. Oral Oncol. 2020;102:104551. - PubMed
    1. Nocini R, Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Biological and epidemiologic updates on lip and oral cavity cancers. Ann Cancer Epidemiol. 2020:4. 10.21037/ace.2020.01.01.
    1. Chow LQM. Head and Neck Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):60–72. - PubMed
    1. Ng SW, Syamim Syed Mohd Sobri SN, Zain RB, Kallarakkal TG, Amtha R, Wiranata Wong FA, Rimal J, Durward C, Chea C, Jayasinghe RD et al. Barriers to early detection and management of oral cancer in the Asia Pacific region. J Health Services Res Policy. 2022;27(2):133–140. - PubMed