How (and why) languages became more complex as we evolved more prosocial: the human self-domestication view
- PMID: 39895972
- PMCID: PMC11782162
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1499994
How (and why) languages became more complex as we evolved more prosocial: the human self-domestication view
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum: How (and why) languages became more complex as we evolved more prosocial: the human self-domestication view.Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 11;16:1583411. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1583411. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40134735 Free PMC article.
-
Corrigendum: How (and why) languages became more complex as we evolved more prosocial: the human self-domestication view.Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 17;16:1598542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1598542. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40313901 Free PMC article.
Abstract
This paper aims to re-examine the problem of the emergence of present-day languages from the specific perspective of the self-domestication account of human evolution. According to this view, our species went through an evolutionary process that parallels the changes experienced by domesticated mammals. Relying on evidence of diverse kind (from paleogenetic to clinical), the paper argues that our self-domestication might have potentiated the cognitive and behavioral features of the human phenotype with an impact on language acquisition and use. Specifically, it might have facilitated the creation of the cultural niche that favors the complexification of languages via a cultural mechanism. The paper further proposes a model of language complexification in the past under the effects of human self-domestication, including the complexification of the structural aspects of language (grammar, prosody, and semantics) and the potentiation of its functional properties (pragmatics). The paper concludes with some suggestions for any future research aimed to test and improve this view.
Keywords: aggression; human self-domestication; language evolution; language structural complexity; language uses; prehistory.
Copyright © 2025 Benítez-Burraco.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Figures



Similar articles
-
The (Co)Evolution of Language and Music Under Human Self-Domestication.Hum Nat. 2023 Jun;34(2):229-275. doi: 10.1007/s12110-023-09447-1. Epub 2023 Apr 25. Hum Nat. 2023. PMID: 37097428 Free PMC article.
-
Human Self-Domestication and the Evolution of Pragmatics.Cogn Sci. 2021 Jun;45(6):e12987. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12987. Cogn Sci. 2021. PMID: 34170029
-
Corrigendum: How (and why) languages became more complex as we evolved more prosocial: the human self-domestication view.Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 17;16:1598542. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1598542. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40313901 Free PMC article.
-
The evolution of human music in light of increased prosocial behavior: a new model.Phys Life Rev. 2024 Dec;51:114-228. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2023.11.016. Epub 2023 Dec 28. Phys Life Rev. 2024. PMID: 39426069 Review.
-
Evaluating the self-domestication hypothesis of human evolution.Evol Anthropol. 2019 May;28(3):133-143. doi: 10.1002/evan.21777. Epub 2019 Apr 2. Evol Anthropol. 2019. PMID: 30938920 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous