Human recreational activity does not influence open cup avian nest survival in urban green spaces
- PMID: 39897430
- PMCID: PMC11782460
- DOI: 10.1007/s11252-024-01669-0
Human recreational activity does not influence open cup avian nest survival in urban green spaces
Abstract
The breeding period of birds is a critical and sensitive portion of the annual cycle. Understanding how human use of urban green spaces affects nest survival can improve our understanding of conserving breeding bird populations in cities and support science-based management of urban green spaces that benefit both people and nature. We conducted a nest survival field study between April and August of 2023 in multiple green spaces in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, the country's second-largest city. We asked whether human presence (distance to trails and amount of human activity) influences the nest survival of four common open-cup nesting bird species: American robins (Turdus migratorius), gray catbirds (Dumetella carolinensis), Northern cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis), and yellow warblers (Setophaga petechia). We also asked if variables traditionally associated with nest survival, such as vegetation concealment and seasonality, would influence nest survival. Our analyses surprisingly revealed no significant influence of human activity, vegetation concealment, and seasonality on nest survival for our target species. We found for nests that did fail, nests established during the earlier part of the nesting period failed faster. American robin nests were the most successful of our study's four target species, whereas Northern cardinal nests were the least successful. Within the limitations of our study system, our findings suggest that human presence on trails is not negatively impacting the nesting success for our target bird species using urban green spaces. Our study provides integrated science advice to land managers so they can support opportunities for people to connect with nature without causing trade-offs with biodiversity conservation.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11252-024-01669-0.
Keywords: Avifauna; Nest survival; Recreation; Urban ecology; Urban green spaces.
© Crown 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Land-sharing vs. land-sparing urban development modulate predator-prey interactions in Europe.Ecol Appl. 2020 Apr;30(3):e02049. doi: 10.1002/eap.2049. Epub 2020 Jan 8. Ecol Appl. 2020. PMID: 31762100
-
Variation in the structure of bird nests between northern Manitoba and southeastern Ontario.PLoS One. 2011 Apr 28;6(4):e19086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019086. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21552515 Free PMC article.
-
Nest site selection for five common birds and their coexistence in an urban habitat.Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:748-759. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.508. Epub 2019 Jul 4. Sci Total Environ. 2019. PMID: 31302540
-
Patch, matrix and disturbance variables negatively influence bird community structure in small-sized managed green spaces located in urban core areas.Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 20;801:149617. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149617. Epub 2021 Aug 14. Sci Total Environ. 2021. PMID: 34411790
-
Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Aug;84(3):485-513. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00085.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009. PMID: 19659887 Review.
References
-
- Bache S, Wickham H (2022) Magrittr: a forward-pipe operator for R. https://magrittr.tidyverse.org, https://github.com/tidyverse/magrittr. Accessed 15 June 2024
-
- Bailey RLT, Phillips T, Faulkner-Grant H, Lowe J, Martin JM, Bonney R (2019) NestWatch nest monitoring manual. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY
-
- Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
-
- Beale CM, Monaghan P (2004) Human disturbance: people as predation-free predators? J Appl Ecol 41(2):335–343. 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00900.x
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous