Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 10:44:e00450.
doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2025.e00450. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Observational assessment of the utilization of donated point of care tests and glycemic control at free and charitable clinics across the United States

Affiliations

Observational assessment of the utilization of donated point of care tests and glycemic control at free and charitable clinics across the United States

Sonak D Pastakia et al. Pract Lab Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Populations experiencing poverty often lack access to convenient lab tests. This analysis assesses trends observed from a national point of care (POC) lab donation program for free and charitable clinics across the United States.

Methods: A total of 16 clinics were selected to receive a comprehensive package of POC lab tests. De-identified data on POC test utilization and results were assessed to descriptively identify trends in utilization (primary objective) and glycemic control (secondary objective). A paired t-test was utilized to identify statistically significant changes in HbA1c from baseline to predefined 90-day time intervals for all people living with diabetes (PLWD) and those with a baseline HbA1c ≥ 9.0 % (75 mmol/mol). The main comparison of interest was the change in HbA1c from baseline to 90-179 days.

Results: A total of 17,563 POC tests were completed for 9658 patients with 3223 tests being HbA1c's. In the secondary analysis of PLWD with a baseline HbA1c ≥ 9.0 % (75 mmol/mol), patients who completed an HbA1c between 90 and 179 days (n = 188) demonstrated a statistically significant mean reduction from baseline of -1.2 % (95 % CI, -1.6 % to -0.9 %, p < 0.01, -10 mmol/mol [95 % CI, -6 mmol/mol - -14 mmol/mol]).

Discussion: The provision of POC labs helped support the care populations experiencing poverty received at free and charitable clinics, especially for chronic diseases like diabetes.

Keywords: Diabetes; Free and charitable clinics; HbA1c; Philanthropy; Point of care labs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Sonak Pastakia reports financial support was provided by Heart to Heart International. Sonak Pastakia reports a relationship with Heart to Heart International that includes: consulting or advisory. SDP serves as a consultant for the philanthropic activities of other pharmaceutical companies including BD and Abbott. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Heart to Heart International Point of Care (POC) lab test donation sites per state since inception in 2016 (A) and Recent Sites Included in this Analysis (B)(the numbers in each state represent the number of implementation sites per state).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Utilization of different point of care tests by type (A) and variability by clinic (B). (each bar in graph B illustrates the consumption of each test by each of the 16 different partner clinics) HbA1c-glycosylated hemoglobin, HIV-Human immunodeficiency virus, Hep C – hepatitis C, Strep A – Group A Streptococcus, Flu A/B – Influenza type A/B, RSV-respiratory syncytial virus, PT/INR – prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, COVID – coronavirus disease.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
– Summary of utilization of HbA1c.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
– HbA1c Trends for Patients with a Baseline HbA1c ≥ 9.0 % (75 mmol/mol) and subsequent follow-up results ∗p < 0.01 via paired t-test.

Similar articles

References

    1. Chen S., et al. The macroeconomic burden of noncommunicable diseases in the United States: estimates and projections. PLoS One. 2018;13(11) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rabi D.M., et al. Association of socio-economic status with diabetes prevalence and utilization of diabetes care services. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2006;6:124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu C., et al. Diabetes risk among US adults with different socioeconomic status and behavioral lifestyles: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Front. Public Health. 2023;11 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall M.A. Rediscovering the importance of free and charitable clinics. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;389(7):585–587. - PubMed
    1. DeVoe J.E., et al. Community health center use after Oregon's randomized medicaid experiment. Ann. Fam. Med. 2015;13(4):312–320. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources