Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Sep 7;10(12):890-895.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.08.023. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Misdiagnosis of pseudo-ineffective biventricular pacing using the automatic effective cardiac resynchronization therapy algorithm

Masaki Taniguchi  1 , Takafumi Oka  2 , Tomoaki Nakano  2 , Kentaro Ozu  2 , Takayuki Sekihara  2 , Yasushi Sakata  2
Affiliations
Case Reports

Misdiagnosis of pseudo-ineffective biventricular pacing using the automatic effective cardiac resynchronization therapy algorithm

Masaki Taniguchi et al. HeartRhythm Case Rep. .
No abstract available

Keywords: Algorithm; Biventricular pacing; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Congestive heart failure; EffectvCRT; Misdiagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Takafumi Oka received remuneration for lectures from Medtronic Japan and Yasushi Sakata received a scholarship from Medtronic Japan; the rest of the authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A: Twelve-lead electrocardiogram of biventricular pacing (BiVp) at the routine visit immediately before EffectivCRT (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) was turned on. B: Trends in the percentage of effective BiVp (%EBiVp) and ventricular pacing (%Vp) after EffectivCRT was turned on. C: Trends in the pacing threshold of left ventricular pacing (LVp) after EffectivCRT was turned on. D: Trends in LV lead impedance after EffectivCRT was turned on. E: Intracardiac electrogram when the %EBiVp was approximately 30% just after EffectivCRT was turned on. ms = milliseconds; PW = pulse width.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A: A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) showing the absence of own beat under biventricular pacing (BiVp) off. B: Electrogram (EGM) during manually created loss of capture. C: EGMs under left ventricular pacing (LVp) only, BiVp (VV delay: left ventricle→right ventricle 60–0 milliseconds and RV→LV 0–80 milliseconds), and right ventricular pacing (RVp) only. Red arrows indicate positive wave preceding negative wave in unipolar LV. LV = left ventricle; ms = milliseconds; RV = right ventricle.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A: Conduction latency under right ventricular pacing (RVp) only (left), left ventricular pacing (LVp) only (middle), and biventricular pacing (BiVp) (right). Amplitude: 0.25 mV/10 mm. B: EffectivCRT algorithm. The 4 criteria (1–4) must be fulfilled for the diagnosis of effective BiVp. Criterion 4 (|Max.|+|Min.| ≥1.6 mV) was the key criterion in this case. C: Electrogram (EGM) (upper) immediately after turning on EffectivCRT (left) and at the revisit (right). The manually measured sums of the negative and positive peaks (|Max. |+|Min.|) are shown above the EGMs. Chest radiograph (lower panel). The cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and serum N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels are also shown. Max. = maximum; Min. = minimum; msec = milliseconds.
Supplemental Figure 1
Supplemental Figure 1
Fluoroscopic image of the lead positions.
Supplemental Figure 2
Supplemental Figure 2
Electrogram under biventricular pacing (BiVp) rates (80–30 ppm). ECG = electrocardiogram; LV = left ventricular; RV = right ventricular.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kamath G.S., Cotiga D., Koneru J.N., et al. The utility of 12-lead Holter monitoring in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation for the identification of nonresponders after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1050–1055. - PubMed
    1. Koplan B.A., Kaplan A.J., Weiner S., Jones P.W., Seth M., Christman S.A. Heart failure decompensation and all-cause mortality in relation to percent biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: is a goal of 100% biventricular pacing necessary? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:355–360. - PubMed
    1. Mullens W., Grimm R.A., Verga T., et al. Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:765–773. - PubMed
    1. Hayes D.L., Boehmer J.P., Day J.D., et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy and the relationship of percent biventricular pacing to symptoms and survival. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1469–1475. - PubMed
    1. Ghosh S., Stadler R.W., Mittal S. Automated detection of effective left-ventricular pacing: going beyond percentage pacing counters. Europace. 2015;17:1555–1562. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources