Long-Term Impact of Early Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
- PMID: 39898413
- PMCID: PMC11962826
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31435
Long-Term Impact of Early Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Abstract
Background: Hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) detected on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is considered leaflet thrombosis. However, its impact on long-term clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of early HALT detection after TAVI on long-term clinical outcomes and structural valve deterioration beyond 6 years.
Methods: Of the 672 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI between 2013 and 2018, 448 were treated with either SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3 and underwent MDCT analysis within 30 days after TAVI. MDCT results and echocardiographic data were analyzed annually.
Results: HALT was detected in 68 (15.2%) of 448 eligible patients within 30 days after TAVI. No significant difference in effective orifice area was observed by echocardiography within 30 days after TAVI between the HALT and the non-HALT groups in SAPIEN XT (HALT vs. non-HALT: 1.62 ± 0.66 cm2 vs. 1.72 ± 0.43 cm2; p = 0.26) and in SAPIEN 3 (1.42 ± 0.35 cm2 vs. 1.45 ± 0.34 cm2; p = 0.63). No significant differences in all-cause mortality (52.9% vs. 60.0%; hazard ratio (HR): 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.70; p = 0.3), stroke incidence (5.9% vs. 7.1%; HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.08-13.7; p = 0.97), heart failure rehospitalization (10.3% vs. 15.0%; HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 0.89-5.99; p = 0.09), and structural valve deterioration (14.7% vs. 17.9%; HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.45-1.73; p = 0.73) were observed between the HALT and the non-HALT groups during the median follow-up of 1872 (interquartile range; 1203-2468) days.
Conclusions: HALT within 30 days was not associated with clinical outcomes or hemodynamic performance during long-term follow-up.
Keywords: balloon‐expandable valve; hypoattenuated leaflet thickening; long‐term; structural valve deterioration; transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
© 2025 The Author(s). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Hayashida is a clinical proctor for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Medical, and Medtronic. Dr. Shimizu and Dr. Takahashi are clinical proctors at Edwards Life Sciences. Dr. Tsuruta is a clinical screening proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Kapadia S. R., Leon M. B., Makkar R. R., et al., “5‐year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Standard Treatment for Patients With Inoperable Aortic Stenosis (Partner 1): A Randomised Controlled Trial,” Lancet 385 (2015): 2485–2491. - PubMed
-
- Mack M. J., Leon M. B., Smith C. R., et al., “5‐year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for High Surgical Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis (Partner 1): A Randomised Controlled Trial,” Lancet 385 (2015): 2477–2484. - PubMed
-
- Mylotte D. and Piazza N., “Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Failure: Deja Vu Ou Jamais Vu?,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 8, no. 4 (2015): e002531. - PubMed
-
- Waksman R., Bhogal S., Gordon P., et al., “Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Impact of Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Low‐Risk Patients: Lrt Trial 4‐Year Outcomes,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 16 (2023): e012655. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Associated data
- Actions
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
